VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Source-Connect
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
vkuehn
DC


Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 688
Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jason Huggins wrote:


I doubt big studios are excited about the growth of the home studio. While most home studios aren't equipped to record music, a decent home studio makes a big recording studio unnecessary for VO...at least in most cases.



Though I make a supposition, I am engaging in a conversation "above my paygrade". I'm a mature voice so I don't even gear up for some of the broadcast market. I'm finding there is room for me in the long-form genre.

When we talk about studios, when we talk about studios that want to connect via ISDN, I "assume" studios come in two categories and some of them are hybrids of the two.

There are professional, well staffed studios who are in the recording business. They see the home studio as a competition. They get their instructions from an ad agency or some other entity: "Record this talent. He/she is remote... we don't want to pay for travel. Get on the space-age phone of your and get it done."

At the other extreme are sales people who are agents reaching out to find talent and get the job done. It would be no skin off their back if ALL talent could do their own recording at home because it is not fun paying for big city rent for real estate for a studio that sits empty part of the time. These are the folks that need to recognize that maybe the future is not ISDN.

Again, I understand that voice talent ends up dealing with people at each extreme of my examples, but probably a number of clients who are in between those extremes.... and some are in transition to sit somewhere else on that see-saw board.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ed Fisher
DC


Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 605
Location: East Coast, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would it be accurate to say the with the use of a "bridging company" that having SC is the same as having ISDN?

In other words, if you have SC could you not then say you have ISDN? Or, at the very least, that you are "ISDN accessible?" I mean...can the other end tell the difference?
_________________
"I reserve the right to be completely wrong."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
graemespicer
Been Here Awhile


Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 243
Location: Toronto

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a debate I've had a number of times recently - I claim to be "ISDN capable", and most seem to think this is a fair characterization without being untruthful.
_________________
Graeme Spicer
Voice Actor

Member of the World-Voices Executive Board

tel • (416) 716-2246
email • graeme@graemespicer.com
graemespicer.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jason Huggins
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 12 Aug 2011
Posts: 1846
Location: In the souls of a million jeans

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I say I can bridge with ISDN. There is a HUGE difference between having ISDN and bridging. Bridging it way less reliable, and I know people (even one of my agents) who have declared that they will NEVER use bridging because of how it looks to a client when it messes up.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ConnieTerwilliger
Triple G


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 3381
Location: San Diego - serving the world

PostPosted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have Source-Connect. Use it with an Italian client and one in Ohio.
_________________
Playing for a living...
www.voiceover-talent.com
YouTube Channel: http://youtube.com/connieterwilliger
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Adam Verner
Contributore Level V


Joined: 04 Jan 2007
Posts: 198
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm planning on getting SC soon and advertising it as "SouceConnect and ISDN bridging available."
_________________
Adam
************************************
Natural Voice
adamverner.com
adamverner.com/blog
twitter.com/adam_verner
************************************
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Matto
Club 300


Joined: 27 Nov 2007
Posts: 391
Location: Vancouver Island, British Columbia

PostPosted: Thu Sep 19, 2013 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I use Source Connect about once a month now, with clients in the U.S. and Europe. Once you have solid up down speeds, it's really good.

I could be wrong, but I think that you can only do the installments payment with the "Pro" version. At least that was the case when I was purchasing the license.

I don't think you need the Pro version and no producer has ever brought it up, except when gasbagging about Source Connect and speaking about the different plans.
_________________
www.mattcowlrick.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group