VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Why I still use the Oxford comma
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Foog
DC


Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Posts: 608
Location: Upper Canuckistan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I loves me some Oxford comma! But I'm also fascinated by the few times when it DOESN'T work. Here are a couple I've found (these are from mentalfloss.com)...

"Those at the ceremony were the commodore, the fleet captain, the donor of the cup, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Jones."
With the comma, it reads as if Mr. Smith was the donor of the cup, which he was not.

"There are certain places where for the sake of clarity and good form the presence of a comma is obligatory, but on the other hand a too liberal use of this form of punctuation tends to slow up the pace of the reading matter and to create confusion and hesitancy in the mind of the reader."
This one just "reads" better without more commas, the content itself happily explains why.

and my favourite...
"By train, plane and sedan chair, Peter Ustinov retraces a journey made by Mark Twain a century ago. The highlights of his global tour include encounters with Nelson Mandela, an 800-year-old demigod and a dildo collector."
Supposedly from an actual TV listing. The Oxford comma would keep Mandela from being a dildo collector. However, even the Oxford comma can't keep him from being an 800-year-old demigod. "There's only so much a comma can do."


FinMac wrote:
The improper use of the comma can be dangerous. At least according to Lynne Truss. She wrote a great book called, "Eats, shoots & Leaves".

Great book! Whodathunk grammar and the like could actually be so much fun to read about?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jasbart
Been Here Awhile


Joined: 26 Sep 2006
Posts: 293
Location: Gilbertsville, KY

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Foog wrote:

"Those at the ceremony were the commodore, the fleet captain, the donor of the cup, Mr. Smith, and Mr. Jones."
With the comma, it reads as if Mr. Smith was the donor of the cup, which he was not.

"There are certain places where for the sake of clarity and good form the presence of a comma is obligatory, but on the other hand a too liberal use of this form of punctuation tends to slow up the pace of the reading matter and to create confusion and hesitancy in the mind of the reader."
This one just "reads" better without more commas, the content itself happily explains why.


I thought the donor of the cup WAS Mr. Smith. Proceeding under that assumption...

Not to totally avoid the problem, but there are times when these laundry lists should just be re-written. As previously stated, there's only so much you can ask of the comma. In the example above it should read, "...the donor of the cup (Mr. Smith) and Mr. Jones." Notice in this example I DIDN'T use the Oxford comma, as it's not needed for understandability.

Jim
_________________
Jim Barton
Barton Voice & Sound
www.bartonvoice.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Yonie
CM


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 906

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or you could simply rearrange the list to read "...Mr. Smith, Mr. Jones, and the donor of the cup." Either way, that sentence will be confusing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Lee Gordon
A Zillion


Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 6866
Location: West Hartford, CT

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 4:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is only so much a comma can do. If arranging the commas in a sequence does not eliminate the ambiguity, it's time to re-write the sentence, or even break it into two sentences.
_________________
Lee Gordon, O.A.V.
Voice President of the United States
www.leegordonproductions.com
Twitter: @LeeGordonVoice
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
vkuehn
DC


Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 688
Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I follow this thread, I find myself sorting things out this way:
(1) If I am writing material that other people will read in an essay, a book or a letter, the use of commas should help the reader, and not distract the reader who might stop following the thought and start pondering grammar and writing style and lose the thought.

(2) If I am formatting a script to that I can read it aloud, or some some other oral-delivery-person can read aloud, then I may use commas, ellipses, blank space or strangely placed line-breaks to help the delivery of the oral product. (The listener need never know about punctuation that was strange or against the rules.)

The listener will not observe commas, Oxford or otherwise, but will hear voice inflections that do for the listener..... what commas and underlines and yellow hi-liters do for us.

Now, when I go into the studio.... can I remember how that system works?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Harrison
M&M


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 2029
Location: Equidistant from New York City and Philadelphia, along the NJ Shore

PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2014 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Diane Maggipinto wrote:
it's the potato's that have eyes .....................

Not "potatoes?"

Wink
_________________
Mike
Male Voice Over Talent
I have taken leave of my sensors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
WillMWatt
Contributor IV


Joined: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 138
Location: New York, NY

PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2014 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my other life, I work for Oxford University. I always considered myself a bit of a grammar pedant before I started there. Nope, turns out I'm not. You've heard of Grammar Nazis; these are the bloody Gestapo!

So, since learning what the Oxford Comma actually is, I have become a keen proponent. Anything to stop a member of the governing body pedantically "misunderstanding" my emails, in order to point out my stupidity, is a winner in my book.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group