View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 5:49 am Post subject: Telefunken AR 51 |
|
|
Just curious if anyone has tried the Telefunken AR-51 tube mic? Or even it's posh cousin the ELA M 250/1?
On paper the AR-51 looks like a good choice for v/o; excellent mid/high clarity, subtle shelving dip from 200 Hz down.
I like the AK47 quite a lot - wondered if you had any thoughts on this one? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you like the AK47 you should like the AR51.
The high end on the AR51 is not hyped, so if you're looking for shimmery highs look elsewhere- though this lends itself to be played with in the 5 to 10K range with just a touch of eq. I would put this on a nice British preamp like the 1073 (GAP 73) this would be a classic matching like its older sister the ELAM 251 was back in the day.
The AR51 might be too much mic for most VO, I lean toward the Gefell MT71 s as a general announce microphone. But the AR51 would be a very nice flavor to add to the mic locker. You might have a bit of a challenge choosing between the AR51 and the AK47. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
todd ellis A Zillion

Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 10529 Location: little egypt
|
Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
i prefer the stopping power of the 7.62mm ... oh, wait ... we're talking microphones ... never mind. _________________ "i know philip banks": todd ellis
who's/on/1st?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Sommer wrote: | If you like the AK47 you should like the AR51.
The high end on the AR51 is not hyped, so if you're looking for shimmery highs look elsewhere- though this lends itself to be played with in the 5 to 10K range with just a touch of eq. I would put this on a nice British preamp like the 1073 (GAP 73) this would be a classic matching like its older sister the ELAM 251 was back in the day.
The AR51 might be too much mic for most VO, I lean toward the Gefell MT71 s as a general announce microphone. But the AR51 would be a very nice flavor to add to the mic locker. You might have a bit of a challenge choosing between the AR51 and the AK47. |
Too much mic Mike?
Curious. Do you mean too much for a small room? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Too much mic, as in driving a Lamborghini to the market to get a dozen eggs.
Though the price does make it very affordable, and tempting. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mike Sommer wrote: | Too much mic, as in driving a Lamborghini to the market to get a dozen eggs.
Though the price does make it very affordable, and tempting. |
Aha! Yes I know what you mean. It sure gives you a lot of confidence to hear something silky in your cans though! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gregory Best The Gates of Troy

Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 1853 Location: San Diego area (east of Connie and south and east of Bailey)
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2011 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Todd, I personally prefer a 30mm with the Humvee shock mount. Adds a touch color and a higher db output. Tracers add even more color in low mood light for softer reads. You'll need a rugged pre for this special road kit. Ymmv. _________________ Gregory Best
greg@gregorybest.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris T
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd be careful of the Tele AR. If you read the fine print you will realize that they use quality controlled capsules from China. So basically they rebrand Chinese mics with some mods on the inside. They do sound pretty decent, but at this point, you are paying for the Tele badge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chris, that's an incorrect statement.
It might be good to understand that this Telefunken company is not the original Telefunken of Germany. This is TELEFUNKEN Elektroakustik, and has only been around since 2001, and located in South Windsor Connecticut in the good ol' US of A. They have exclusive rights to manufacture and sell replicas of the original Telefunken mics, to over 27 countries. Every mic is hand built in the USA, only the capsule and the power supply of the AR51 are made offshore .
Personally, I would not be worried about the Chinese capsule. Over the past few years the Chinese have become quite adept at making capsules. The capsules also receive 3 levels of quality control before they go into the mic.
With any mic, even a clone, we know that there are going to be some differences to the sound - we expect that. Every capsule is going to sound different, no matter where they come from, because there are many kinds of capsule, made in many different ways.
The art of microphone design, is to take a capsule, whether it cost $100 or $800, and make it sound the way you want it to. In this case they wanted to make an more affordable mic that sounded something like the $9,000 ELA M 251 E, and they achieved that goal.
They did this by using a less expensive capsule, tuning and mounting the electronics onto a PC board vs. "point to point" like in the ELA M251, and moving the pattern switching to the power supply, thus eliminating a very costly and complicated part.
Yeah, you cold get the German capsule version of the AR51, but in the end, it would cost you about $5000.00.
Here are some nice samples:
http://proaudiotoys.com/AudioTests/TubeMicsComparison_3-29-2010/ _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Last edited by Mike Sommer on Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:50 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chris T
Joined: 27 Jul 2010 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think you and I are basically saying the same thing, you just said it much better than I did. I talked at length with the Tele guys at AES last year and they explained the same process. I should have been more specific. These mics do sound good, buyers just need to understand they are not getting that $9000 tele mic, they are getting a good sounding "lite" version of it that still sounds very good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
So I got the AR-51 but had them mod it with the CK-12 capsule (same as the ELA-M 251) and a custom paint job. Finally I think I've got a tube mic I can live with. Nicely articulate, but not nearly so aggressive in the mids as the various U47 clones I've tried before. This is a very smoooooth mic that takes EQ very well.
Downside? It's a tad noisier than I'd like, but I'm waiting on a vintage GE 6072 five star tube which I'm told tests as quiet as it gets. I'll post some clips then.
Meantime here's a couple of pics...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/65151558@N07/5933374969/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow! like, don't bogart the mic man, share some samples with us...
That hiss is part of the charm. It's the imperfections that make it perfect, the "Wabi Sabi" if you will. Beauty is in the imperfections.
Now I'll ask, what preamp are you using?
When you record what is your nominal and peak recording levels?
Do you normalize?
Do you use compression when you record?
What bit and sample rate to you record in?
Let's see if we can get you dial in. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bruce Boardmeister

Joined: 06 Jun 2005 Posts: 7977 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Smokin' mic, dude.
B _________________ VO-BB Member #31 Enlisted June, 2005
I'm not a Zoo, but over the years I've played one on radio/TV. . |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
very nice paint job on that mic...just don't get pulled over with it
in your glovebox...at least not in Ohio....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Steve Knight Contributore Level V

Joined: 26 Mar 2011 Posts: 186 Location: Somewhere between Baltimore & DC
|
Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just heard from Willie Nelson,...he wants to record his next album on that mic... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|