 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
osmithy
Joined: 15 Feb 2012 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:21 pm Post subject: 4x4 WhisperRoom treatment, recording position, and waterfall |
|
|
Hello VO-BB community! I've been lurking as a guest for almost a year now, and I've loved all the great information and generous people. I have a question specific to my setup, so I'm making my first post!
I have the same 4x4 WhisperRoom as Rob Ellis, and he has been very kind to send me a few pictures of his setup, specifically the acoustic treatment. Like many, I discovered once my company bought it that the acoustics in the booth aren't great, and even though I have 12 panels of OC 703 on the walls, it still sounds a little weird, especially when the artist is more than 3 inches from the mic. I have nothing on the door or ceiling, but that's changing soon. Rob's setup has OC 703 wall-to-wall on the upper 80% of the booth walls and the ceiling, and OC 705 across the corners. I saw, though, that he seems to record standing up, whereas my booth is designed for artists to record sitting down. The mic is placed a little more than halfway up between the floor and the ceiling. My question is: can I use his same setup, or do I need to rearrange things because I'm recording near the middle instead of the top?
I have a picture of the booth, and I also have a waterfall and frequency response graph I made using FuzzMeasure. I would love someone knowledgeable to determine if my readings look normal, and if so, what it indicates I should do to improve the acoustics of the booth. In the booth picture, you can see where I placed the speaker and mic to use with FuzzMeasure. Note that the speaker is only rated for 56 Hz, so there's a pretty sharp drop below that. The orange music stand is made of metal with cotton fabric over it. I've also recorded a sample in case there's something really obvious in the sound that suggests what I need to improve.
http://bars-tone.com/images/vo/voicetest.mp3
Thanks so much for any help you can provide.
Cheers,
Owen |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BALKY Contributore Level V

Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Rockaways (Queens, New York, USA)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 5:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
This booth sounds very good to my ears at your normal distance. By all means use the close mic technique but only when you want that huge proximity effect for special effect.
The chart looks good too. I think you will struggle to do better in such a small room, but honestly I don't hear any nasty artifacts.
Monitoring here on Spiral Groove Sonic Animas.
I'd be well pleased if I were you.... _________________ Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sounds good to me.
My only suggestion is get some fire-rated burlap
from ATS Acoustics to cover up the OC 703 (oh and a can of Scotch adhesive also to secure the burlap)
IMO a booth that is properly treated can sound quite good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, to me at 6" the lows are tubby (but not deep) and the mids are all smeared and phasey. It doesn't sound reverberant with an obvious slapback, it just sounds not defined. I had the same issues trying to record in a smaller space. My guess is you could be better off in a more open space that is treated and use a nice noise reduction/slight compander. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
osmithy
Joined: 15 Feb 2012 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2012 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for all the feedback, everyone! I very much appreciate your taking the time to respond.
Lance, you have said what I've been wanting to say but didn't know the right words for. I've been trying to cut down on the phasey-ness, but it's been difficult to get a clearly-defined sound consistently without eating the mic. I agree that I would definitely be better off in a larger space, but unfortunately there's nowhere that has adequate sound isolation other than the booth.
I'm most likely going to order 6 more panels each of OC 703 and 705 in the near future. I'll try a few configurations to see how they sound.
Thanks,
Owen |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You DON'T want to have all that fiberglass open inside that tiny booth, that's all going in your lungs, man! OC703 has formaldehyde in it, very nasty stuff. Wrap it in cloth ASAP, even just some jersy knit bed sheets.
I think it sounds fine, no need to keep chasing the acoustical unicorn. _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|