View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:41 pm Post subject: TLM 103 vs TLM 102 vs Studio Projects C1 vs ? |
|
|
Deep baritone/bass male. Narration purposes, some broadcast
Got the itch to retire my workhorse MXL v88.
TLM 103 or 102 are within budget. No dedicated pre. MBox mini 3
Thoughts? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
all good mics in my experience, and all are being used by successful VOs.
I gotta ask, tho, have you considered a Sennheiser 416? You could get one for about the same price as a TLM 103. Just another option to possibly consider. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep, have considered. Have considered the Neumann and the Senn both. Together. One narration, one promo.
Overkill? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No.
That combination is the mic locker for more than a few VOs out there.
As in Doug Turkel, Peter O' Connell among others if I am not mistaken |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If it's mostly for narration, then maybe the 102. I'd highly recommend the C1 for bass/baritone voices. I know a guy in Atlanta like that who uses one and he sounds great on it - just make sure it's the newer model with the red badge on it.
Yeah, it's what I'm using, but the CAD E100s is very good for narration. Not dissimilar to a 102 in sound, but it's a supercardioid with crazy-low self-noise (3.7 dbA). Made in the USA, and only $360 new. It has a pretty big beefy sound with a smooth top and handles processing like a champ for promos & commercial work with its very focused sound. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did find the older thread from the summer that touched on this..
the CAD sounds good on you Lance, just heard the sample...
that e100s is definitely a sleeper.. But I'm one of those guys lives in the lower part of frequency spectrum for sure. so its tricky.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Philip Banks Je Ne Sais Quoi

Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 11075 Location: Portgordon, Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just get a 416. Use at normal range (couple of feet) for proper jobs and get far too close ( 3inches max distance from tip) for promo work. Alternative would be to get a U87 and not bother with anything except reading out loud.
The Neumann U87 - The lazy Voice Mic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bish 3.5 kHz

Joined: 22 Nov 2009 Posts: 3738 Location: Lost in the cultural wasteland of Long Island
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Philip... I think that's the most charitable thing you've ever said about the 416!
I must admit, having had a chance work with one recently, it didn't sound half-bad at all. It also seems to travel well. _________________ Bish a.k.a. Bish
Smoke me a kipper... I'll be back for breakfast.
I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
heyguido MMD

Joined: 31 Aug 2011 Posts: 2507 Location: RDU, the Geek Capitol of the South
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's not as much the tools as how you use them.  _________________ Don Brookshire
"Wait.... They wanna PAY me for this?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Philip Banks Je Ne Sais Quoi

Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 11075 Location: Portgordon, Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
The trick with a good mic is to not "use" it but to leave it alone to simply do what it's designed to do.
Imagine an actor on a film set.
"Excuse me is that a 4-16 you're using for this scene?" he asks the sound person.
"No. It's a pair of MKH50s"
"Mmmmmmmmmokay. Would you change them for the 4-16?"
"Oooooooooo sorry dood, if you're not happy that's ok we'll arrange a change"
"Thanks" replies the now satisfied actor.
The sound person is overheard talking with the director and the director agrees. Sure enough within the hour the actor is back in his apartment wondering how he's going to make the rent, |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL, with my past-life experience as a boom-op, on-camera talent are oblivious about the mics. Once in a while, you get someone keen who's like "Is that a Schoeps?" and when you affirm it, they go "NIIIIIIIIICE!" and wink.
The MKH 50 is probably one of the best narration mics ever made. Just saying...and then there is the MKH 60 which was made to replace the 416 and sounds waaaay better...but nobody uses that for VO. Strange.
Keep the V88 and get a $5,000 preamp for it!  _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Philip Banks Je Ne Sais Quoi

Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 11075 Location: Portgordon, Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As a TV continuity announcer for ITV (UK commercial network) my studio had an MKH50 and it sounded very nice indeed. I think the key is that its costs more than the 416 ...with good reason. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heyguido wrote: | It's not as much the tools as how you use them.  |
According to that logic, one should be able to set up shop with a Blue Snowball and call it a day..
That being said, you're not totally off base.. I've booked some cool stuff from a $50 M-audio Producer..
But would I trust that mic to do my voice it's finest justice? Nah |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
heyguido MMD

Joined: 31 Aug 2011 Posts: 2507 Location: RDU, the Geek Capitol of the South
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | set up shop with a Blue Snowball and call it a day |
Hardly. My point is more that once you have a quality tool, it is then necessary to have the skills to use it properly. Some of us get the job done with as little as a low end AKG, and some of us have Neumanns and 416s and other pricey toys. And we haven't even STARTED on pre's yet....
Once you reach a certain level of tools, skills and finesse start to make a big difference. And having the tools doesn't make you an artist. Sometimes, just a hack with shiny tools.
I know guys (and girls) that can turn heads without a mic, from across the room. I saw it in Charlotte last weekend. I won't name names. Those of you who were there saw it too.
I stand by my original statement. _________________ Don Brookshire
"Wait.... They wanna PAY me for this?" |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it goes without saying that one needs the skills in order to compete in this game... and that if you hook up your new Senn 416 and except the cash to start rolling in, you have some issues.
Your original statement is irrefutable.. However, its a loaded statement and can be taken a lot of ways in the course of discussion about gear..
Its an impossible topic to come to an agreement on. There's no way systematically to prove that your state of the art Mic did or didn't help your career.. would a Phillip Banks or a Beau Weaver be who they are without their Senn 416? who knows..
I do know that those of us that work day in and day out at this want every possible edge to succeed. If there's any remote chance that a Senn 416 is gonna get me 10% or even 5% more booking in a year, I'm in...its worth it. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|