View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sean211
Joined: 23 May 2014 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:54 am Post subject: Mic Channel Strip question |
|
|
I have a 416 and both a dbx 286s and a Symetrix 528e (which was gifted to me). I'm in my home studio which has, of course, a noisy heat/ac vent. Both the dbx and 528e are fantastic at killing the vent noise.
Right now I'm using the 528e and running it in to the Apollo Twin Duo and then into Pro Tools. I read a post where George said it doesn't matter about room noise going IN to your DAW. That you can, with more precision, do everything either one of these can do and better.
I know I'd be better served running my 416 directly through the Apollo Twin, room noise and all, and surgically killing the room with plugins inside Pro Tools (I use the Platinum bundle).
I've tried but I'm finding the plugin gating and/or expansion tricky vs. turning the expander threshold up until the room goes away on the 528e. For example, I'm trying to use the Renaissance Channel and can't get it from sounding "ragged" and "raspy" when I take a breath.
Love to hear what you all think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DenaliDave Club 300
Joined: 09 Jan 2016 Posts: 307 Location: Anchorage, Alaska
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since it sounds like you have Waves Central already on your computer, give NS1 a try. It has only one simple slider and it goes 1-100. Don't go crazy, less is more. You'll probably find that you only need to use 2/100.
If you were, say, operating a boom mic outdoors with wind noise and other things you might actually have to crank NS1 up to 20 or 30. For indoor rooms that are already quiet (but not *quite* quiet enough) NS1 is simple, effective, and doesn't cause a gating effect. Gating can be tricky to setup properly so it doesn't sound funny.
NS1 can be run live or offline (on an already recorded track). I don't like to run ANY kind of plugins when recording though. I'd rather have a clean, raw recording for myself or clients to edit/master.
Oh...There's also Waves WNS which is a bit more complex and has more features. Honestly, for me that just means more to fool with and waste time with.
Most of these types of plugins are used to heavily by people and then they run around shouting how horrible they make everything sound. While ideally you would want the perfect acoustic environment before even getting started there will always be a place for these types of tools. _________________ "The wise ones fashioned speech with their thought, sifting it as grain is sifted through a sieve." - Buddha
www.alaskamic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jason Huggins The Gates of Troy
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: In the souls of a million jeans
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
While I agree with the record raw and then process as needed philosophy, if you are working with a client live and they are recording (whether ISDN or Source Connect or ipDTL or whatever) you don't have the chance to process in post. If your noise floor isn't good enough for you (or them) then some expansion might be useful.
If, however, you don't do live sessions like that then it wouldn't make any difference.
Have you tried any of the UAD Plugins? There are multiple channel strips as well as the Valley People Dyna-mite plugin that have an expander that can be dialed in. You want to stay away from a gate, but a well tuned expander in a room that is consistently noisy can clean up your sound.
Is the expander taking anything other than noise out of your sound? Is there ever a time where you can mess up a recording because you had the expander? If the answer to that is YES it would make sense to record raw and dial in your processing to suit. I personally use a DBX 286a for a little bit of expansion and HPF because it sounds cleaner and doesn't affect my overall sound much.
In my situation though, I live close to a freeway and the rumble comes through my house so I'm just getting rid of very consistent low rumble and I'm only reducing it a little bit. I do a lot of live sessions so I want to send clean audio. It also saves time in post because I would always process every bit of audio the same way.
Just don't mess up your settings or you'll be kicking yourself when you have to re-record a project.
Last edited by Jason Huggins on Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:22 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jason Huggins The Gates of Troy
Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Posts: 1846 Location: In the souls of a million jeans
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2017 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh ya. You will probably get a noticeable increase in overall sound quality if you ditch the hardware strips and use the Apollo Twin. I know the 268 affects the 416 in a less than desirable way (not sure about the 528e). I would ditch the 286a in a heartbeat if I didn't have to deal with the low rumble. I am planning on picking up an Apollo Twin and demoing plugins to find the best expander solution. My old iMac only had one TB port that I used as an external monitor so I was waiting to switch over from the iD22 until I upgraded my iMac and had multiple TB ports. Just upgraded the iMac so next is the interface. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dayo Cinquecento
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 2:30 am Post subject: Re: Mic Channel Strip question |
|
|
Sean211 wrote: | I read a post where George said it doesn't matter about room noise going IN to your DAW. That you can, with more precision, do everything either one of these can do and better.
|
Sorry but that's just tosh. Yes you can use noise reduction software and get a passable result, but I've yet to hear a plug-in that can do that without undesirable artefacts. And as for simply using an expander, you are only killing the noise in between your words. All that grunge is still there underneath your words. A HPF is a useful tool, of course for killing rumble. Mini rant over. Whatever happened to the Blue Book? _________________ Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sean211
Joined: 23 May 2014 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 5:19 am Post subject: Re: Mic Channel Strip question |
|
|
Dayo wrote: | Sean211 wrote: | I read a post where George said it doesn't matter about room noise going IN to your DAW. That you can, with more precision, do everything either one of these can do and better.
|
Sorry but that's just tosh. Yes you can use noise reduction software and get a passable result, but I've yet to hear a plug-in that can do that without undesirable artefacts. And as for simply using an expander, you are only killing the noise in between your words. All that grunge is still there underneath your words. A HPF is a useful tool, of course for killing rumble. Mini rant over. Whatever happened to the Blue Book? |
Clarification: the room is treated. Both with sound treatment and ClearSonic acoustic panels. It's just the vent I'm trying to kill. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rob Ellis M&M
Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2017 6:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
If the vent is your only main issue, aren't there vent silencers or mufflers of some sort out there? Seems like I have seen such contraptions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DenaliDave Club 300
Joined: 09 Jan 2016 Posts: 307 Location: Anchorage, Alaska
|
Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:09 pm Post subject: Re: Mic Channel Strip question |
|
|
Dayo wrote: | Sean211 wrote: | I read a post where George said it doesn't matter about room noise going IN to your DAW. That you can, with more precision, do everything either one of these can do and better.
|
Sorry but that's just tosh. Yes you can use noise reduction software and get a passable result, but I've yet to hear a plug-in that can do that without undesirable artefacts. And as for simply using an expander, you are only killing the noise in between your words. All that grunge is still there underneath your words. A HPF is a useful tool, of course for killing rumble. Mini rant over. Whatever happened to the Blue Book? |
Ever tried CEDAR Studio 7?
https://www.adorama.com/cacs2cs7.html
There's probably a reason they can justify a $4,637 pricetag for a piece of software. (I hope!)
You'd be surprised at who is using CEDAR, they started out with hardware units and still make them. Due to their price, you'll probably only find them at high-end places that have deep pockets.
In fact, I'd wager that some folks who've submitted raw recordings to the biggest and most well-known recording studios could very well have had CEDAR run on their recording during final mastering and post without realizing it.
Realistically, it doesn't make much sense to me for talent to spent $4,000+ on software that the studio's probably already have invested in. _________________ "The wise ones fashioned speech with their thought, sifting it as grain is sifted through a sieve." - Buddha
www.alaskamic.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
georgethetech The Gates of Troy
Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1877 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mr. Tosh here
The main reason I tell people not to process on the way in is that if it's not done right it will ruin the recording permanently. There's no undo on front-end processing. If you use an expander on the front end and don't set your gain properly, it's very easy to lose bits of words on a softer delivery. If you have good engineering skills, then by all means use front-end processing!
You've got an Apollo Twin, so why aren't you using a UAD plugin? Ditch the cruddy signal path of those pieces of outboard and use the API Vision channel strip, which has a fantastic high-pass filter and downward expander (and a lot of other stuff to get you in trouble). Insert it in the Unity slot for best possible results. You can also try the Neve 88RS as an alternative. Use in Demo mode until you are satisfied, then pull the trigger. _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ed Fisher DC
Joined: 05 Sep 2012 Posts: 605 Location: East Coast, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2017 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soundgun wrote: |
You've got an Apollo Twin, so why aren't you using a UAD plugin? Ditch the cruddy signal path of those pieces of outboard and use the API Vision channel strip, which has a fantastic high-pass filter and downward expander (and a lot of other stuff to get you in trouble). Insert it in the Unity slot for best possible results. You can also try the Neve 88RS as an alternative. Use in Demo mode until you are satisfied, then pull the trigger. |
My thoughts...EXACTLY.
You might need to do a little "fine tuning"...but once you've got it where you want it...save that configuration and it's yours for the next time. _________________ "I reserve the right to be completely wrong." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sean211
Joined: 23 May 2014 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2017 7:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
soundgun wrote: | Mr. Tosh here
The main reason I tell people not to process on the way in is that if it's not done right it will ruin the recording permanently. There's no undo on front-end processing. If you use an expander on the front end and don't set your gain properly, it's very easy to lose bits of words on a softer delivery. If you have good engineering skills, then by all means use front-end processing!
You've got an Apollo Twin, so why aren't you using a UAD plugin? Ditch the cruddy signal path of those pieces of outboard and use the API Vision channel strip, which has a fantastic high-pass filter and downward expander (and a lot of other stuff to get you in trouble). Insert it in the Unity slot for best possible results. You can also try the Neve 88RS as an alternative. Use in Demo mode until you are satisfied, then pull the trigger. |
Thanks George. I'll do exactly that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jack Daniel Cinquecento
Joined: 23 Jun 2016 Posts: 577 Location: SoCal
|
Posted: Sat May 06, 2017 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Agree with Rob about doing what you can to fix the noise source. I know a guy near me who had a noisy AC into his large booth. Dan Lenard came over and helped him build a baffle box that suppresses the noise wonderfully and still allows him (and his clients, as he also records others) to remain comfortable on those hot Hollywood days.
And as George says, the API Vision Unison plugin is an amazing but dangerous tool. (NB: I also have been called a dangerous tool, but in completely different circumstances.) A light touch on the HPF and expander/gate and you can squelch what remains of your vent noise--AFTER you've reduced it via baffling.
Jack _________________ Jack Daniel
Narrator / Man About Town |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lance Blair M&M
Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2279 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Sat May 13, 2017 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
My thermostat has a great plug in where if I set it to off the noise goes away. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnV Been Here Awhile
Joined: 25 Feb 2016 Posts: 233 Location: Md/DC
|
Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
are we talking
A- noise of air whooshing through the vent?
answer is either/both:
- get a vent that doesn;t whoosh (they make them)
- increase the duct diameter to reduce the air speed thru the vent
- move the vent to the floor area
B- noise of blower/mechanicals rumbling down the ducts and heard through the vent?
answer:
get baffle boxes built and installed along the ducts to eliminate it.
sometimes you can add a long working path of extra insulated flexible duct zigzaging around above the cieling providing similar results
You want quality at the microphone and (CEDAR notwithstnding) no band-aid is better than no-problem in the first place.
(and yeah, the HVAC-FAN-SWITCH manual plug-in is always a go-to!) _________________ SoundscenesDC, main talent and production offices just 385k km up the gravity well in LuNoHoCo Center, old satellite studios still bookable at the future site of Johnson City! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|