VO-BB - 19 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 19 YEARS OLD!
Where A.I. is a four-letter word.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Source Connect receive rates
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 19 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear !
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 1:59 pm    Post subject: Source Connect receive rates Reply with quote

I noticed that the basic version of Source Connect ($395) will only handle mono rates up to 96k and stereo rates up to 192k. Could any of you Source Connecters tell me if it will receive rates any higher than that from someone sending audio using the Pro version?

Thanks!
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Frank F
Fat, Old, and Sassy


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 4421
Location: Park City, Utah

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 4:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The answer is YES! However, to make this possible you would need a very fast broadband connection. The minimums at the higher rates would be near 3 mbps/sustained up and down - on both sides of the connection.

F2
_________________
Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Frank.

My download speed tests at 5441 kbps and my upload speed tests at 490 kbps. If I wanted to send mono 128k Source Connect audio to another user, would that upload speed inhibit me?
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Frank F
Fat, Old, and Sassy


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 4421
Location: Park City, Utah

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mono, 128 k you would be fine. Is this a requirement of one of your clients?

Mono, 96 kbps from a 16 bit 44.1 kHz source is considered "near CD quality" (or as some would say "broadcast quality") as .mp3, 128 kbps is "studio quality" from 16 bit, 48 kHz.

SC would require 512 minimum for stereo at 128 or above.

Remember, BOTH sides of the connection would require the similar upload and download speeds.

Toodles

F2
_________________
Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good to know.

Actually, I'll likely be using a setup that allows for a homeade bridge to ISDN. Therefore, I need to offer quality that compares to the L2 Mono 128 setting on a Zephyr. I don't think 96kbps cuts it.

Thanks again.
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobsouer
Frequent Flyer


Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Posts: 9882
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe,

I can tell you from experience with paying clients that the audio quality using the standard Source Connect version bridged to ISDN has worked extremely well. I'm not the only one on this board who has had similar experiences, again with paying clients.
_________________
Be well,
Bob Souer (just think of lemons)
The second nicest guy in voiceover.
+1-724-613-2749
ISDN, Source Connect, phone patch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Frank F
Fat, Old, and Sassy


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 4421
Location: Park City, Utah

PostPosted: Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks Bob, that was my comment exactly.

Good luck with your project Joe.

Toodles

Frank F
_________________
Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's Bob and Frank. That'd be real cash-saver if the 96kbps is good quality.

Although, Source Connect still suggests having your remote studio PC or laptop running their Pro version for less delay when using the ISDN arrangement. The Source Connect that couples to the ISDN box could be the basic though.
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobsouer
Frequent Flyer


Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Posts: 9882
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe,

There's no question the Pro version of Source Connect gives you much more "fine tuning" control over the various parameters; but the Standard version works very, very well. Though, you're right, when bridged to ISDN, there is somewhat more delay.
_________________
Be well,
Bob Souer (just think of lemons)
The second nicest guy in voiceover.
+1-724-613-2749
ISDN, Source Connect, phone patch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well 96k it will be then, as I just got an email back from Robert at Source Connect who says a Pro version coupled to a basic version will still be limited to 96kbps. I'm guessing the Pro may send it out higher but the basic will only recieve it at 96.

Buying two Pro versions is out of the question so 96kbps it'll have to be if we go this route.

I've always seemed to notice a slight bit of artifacting on any VO below 128 mono.

By the way, in case anyone is curious. This isn't a pleasure project just so I can do ISDN on the road (though it will allow me to do that). ISDN only goes about 18,000 feet. Anywhere between 16 and 18,000 is sketchy and I found out yesterday I'm 17,870 feet from the telco office. This would account for my occasional dropouts.

So, IF AT&T won't budge and put a repeater in the line like I want them to, our next option is to hook the Zephyr up at the inlaws a couple of towns over, They ARE close to the telco office. so we shouldn't have line issues. Source Connect would help me access it whenever I need do a session. It's a little more hands off than I'd like, but we may be left with no other choice. I'd rather not pay to bridge each time I do a session, especially since I already have the Zephyr.
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just did a quick test of the 96kbps setting through an ISDN box.

I saved a simple 10 second piece of voice at 96k mono and piped it through the ISDN box (running L2 Mono 128 setting) and you're right, it still sounds good. As long as it pipes through Source Connect that clean, it would work fine once it hits the ISDN line.
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Frank F
Fat, Old, and Sassy


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 4421
Location: Park City, Utah

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe.

As long as you are starting with 48k audio, piping the audio into SC, then receiving the "bridged" version at the 96k rate, and dumping that audio into the ISDN codec (Telos) - then sending that audio to your client, and reversing the audio to get back to you - there is going to be delay... and a lot of delay. You will have good "broadcast quality audio" - just with high latency.

I would expect you have between 800 and 1500 ms delay or "latency" on a bridged set-up through SC/Telos. This combination could cause even more delay due to the path your audio must take to work with your client.

You have some major decisions to make regarding the "repeater" as well. This technology is very old and may introduce additional artifacts and latency. Instead of taking the hard path. If I may suggest an alternative plan - find a small office or friends basement or "closet" which is closer to the Telco which you consider using as an adjunct "studio" for any ISDN codec required sessions. This suggestion would preclude you having to set up a bridge and would be close to home and easier to work with than your previous suggested idea.

Toodles

F2
_________________
Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com


Last edited by Frank F on Sun Aug 12, 2007 6:11 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frank,

I appreciate that advice. To me, renting office space seems more expensive and time consuming than a bridge. As we just moved to the area recently, there's not really anyone in the immediate vicinity that I'd feel comfortable intruding upon. Plus, bedroom or office, the room would have to be treated for good sound. Your option might be more feasable if our situation was just a little different. I'll keep it in mind anyway though as we may have no other choice.

Hey Bob - You've done Digifon bridge sessions with ISDN and Source Connect I believe. Was the delay tough to deal with?
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobsouer
Frequent Flyer


Joined: 15 Jul 2006
Posts: 9882
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Joe,

It's is as Frank noted above, quite noticeable, but nothing that prevents communication. Liz had a session the other day bridging through EDNet and noticed the same thing, but as long as you remember to pause for a moment before you say something, it's not that tough.
_________________
Be well,
Bob Souer (just think of lemons)
The second nicest guy in voiceover.
+1-724-613-2749
ISDN, Source Connect, phone patch
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address MSN Messenger
Lizden
A Zillion


Joined: 04 Dec 2006
Posts: 8856
Location: The dark recesses of my mind

PostPosted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey Joe!
As Bob said, I had a SC/ISDN Bride session last week.
If you remember to wait a beat or two before answering any question or making a comment after the other end says something you'll be fine!

It's really not that big a deal after the first couple of minutes!

L.
_________________
Liz de Nesnera O.A.V. ~ Livin' The VO Dream!
English/French Bilingual VO w/ ISDN
HireLiz.com / liz@hireliz.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 19 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear ! All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group