View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:30 pm Post subject: lower volume after mixdown |
|
|
Can someone tell me why in Adobe Audition 2.0 that a mixdown from Multi-track has a 3-4 db reduction in volume from the session sounds? _________________ Jeff
http://JeffreyKafer.com
Voice-overload Web comic: http://voice-overload.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kasbah Been Here Awhile
Joined: 13 May 2007 Posts: 276 Location: Baltimore Maryland
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you saying the volume is lower on the bounced or "Finished" WAV or mp3 file? _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheVoiceOfBob 14th Avenue
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1411 Location: Pittsburgher in the Carolinas
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, this is a "feature" you might say. I don't know if they fixed it in Audition 3 or not. It doesn't happen to everyone, but if you are one of the lucky ones (like myself) it's consistent.
I've gotten into the habit of exporting the work, then opening that exported file in edit and using the "+2db" preset in the Amplify to bring it back up to the proper level. _________________ Try to imagine a world where there is no such thing as hypothetical situations.
The Voice of Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that would be a good thing -especily if the mix output -of your working audio file- is close to 0dBFS. Let me explain.
Recording in the digital domain is different than in the analog domain. When we used to record on tape, it was standard practice to record hot in order to saturate the tape, essentally using the tape as a peak limiter. In the digital world this is no longer required. All we need is good clean audio and you can nearly boost it to the moon.
When working in your DAW's ProTools, Logic, Adobe Audition ect.. you're creating your program's Working file and a WAV or AIFF file or what have you.
When you digitally compress a file to a smaller file, you lose some dynamic rage. So if your Working or WAV file is hot (peaking at or above 0dBFS) it will clip in a smaller mp3 file -- and in an analog files, due to intersample peaks.
Here is what mom never told you. When you bounce your file to an mp3, you should be peaking at -4 to -6 dBFS in your working file. This will give you clip free audio. (0 dBFS is assigned to the maximum possible level. A signal that reaches 50% of the maximum level would peak at -6 dBFS.)
There are some programs that do this automatically, this could be a built in feature in Audition.
Louder is not always better. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TheVoiceOfBob 14th Avenue
Joined: 05 Oct 2006 Posts: 1411 Location: Pittsburgher in the Carolinas
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mike,
This reduction in amplitude occurs even if you are exporting to a lossless .WAV file. It also occurs with that same export if your original recording was done at -20dB. (not that you would want it that low) _________________ Try to imagine a world where there is no such thing as hypothetical situations.
The Voice of Bob |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I concur with Bob. Frankly, I've been doing this long enough that I don't need Audition to babysit my volumes. If it's a feature, it's unwelcome. _________________ Jeff
http://JeffreyKafer.com
Voice-overload Web comic: http://voice-overload.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen
Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand. It was just a suspicion of mine. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|