View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:32 am Post subject: Mackie 1202 vs. 1202VLZ3 |
|
|
...does anyone know if there are any differences between the two for phone patch purposes?
I'm looking at a 1202 and a 1202 VLZ....the 1202 is older (circa 1995) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
David Swinehart Contributor III

Joined: 11 Feb 2009 Posts: 90 Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not that I'm aware of... The VLZ model had improved preamp circuitry, but the rest of the wiring/routing was very similar. Assuming you're just using a line-in to route to the phone patch, I don't think you'd notice any difference. _________________ David Swinehart
an actual Dave
Kinetic Sound Labs |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For the VO user, there will be almost no difference. I would stick with at least the VLZ or VLZ Pro (not the oldest original model). _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After some additional research, it looks like the 1202 doesn't have an Alt 3-4 bus, which the VLZ does have....
I'm hoping the VLZ will have some decent pre-amps as well.. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With each update to the Mackie mixers, the primary improvement is the mic preamps. Yes, the ALT 3/4 bus is the key to making these mixers create a mix-minus for phone patch and ISDN use, and is the reason they work so well for VO artist studios. Alesis and Behringer copied the design, so they have the same feature now. _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
David Swinehart Contributor III

Joined: 11 Feb 2009 Posts: 90 Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rellis wrote: | After some additional research, it looks like the 1202 doesn't have an Alt 3-4 bus, which the VLZ does have....
I'm hoping the VLZ will have some decent pre-amps as well.. |
Oops, forgot about that part. I used to own the 1202 VLZ and remember the preamps being fine. I know the later model moved to the XDR preamps, which were a step up. _________________ David Swinehart
an actual Dave
Kinetic Sound Labs |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
todd ellis A Zillion

Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 10529 Location: little egypt
|
Posted: Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
i have found the mackie xdr pres to be super. relatively flat & quiet. _________________ "i know philip banks": todd ellis
who's/on/1st?
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
verbcrunch Contributor III

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 97 Location: Boston, MA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ah, my good ol' Mackie 1202 VLZ STILL in use after 13 years or so.. indispensable little bugger that just keeps going and going and going...
Not a fan of the mic pres at all though, despite the 'improvement'. Compared with a standalone mic pre, very noticable difference for the worse. Haven't compared with the VLZ Pro. _________________ Jeff Berlin
Humble Voice Guy
http://www.jeffberlin.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JeffK T-Shirt

Joined: 22 Dec 2005 Posts: 276 Location: Oz
|
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2009 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Rob, you may recall a post a while back about a cheap alternative to the phone patch.
http://www.vo-bb.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=2118
Don't know if you had a chance to try it. Just a few weeks ago I discovered by accident that this little unit works amazing when plugged into the second input on my mbox and the line out plugged into one of the monitor jacks on the back of the mbox and I can record the caller on a second track. I do this when working with my coach. It is no JK but it works really well especially for the price. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Jeff...I went ahead and got the Mackie.
Okay so got the 1202
The pre-amps aren't bad at all, to my ear....but it picks up a lot more line noise(either from other plugs or my computer) than my main pre-amp.
Any suggestions? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, hold the phone, looks like lowering the input on my Apogee Duet to 0 db does the trick....  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|