View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:26 am Post subject: Stock tubes vs NOS tubes - shoot out |
|
|
Hi everyone
I just fitted some NOS tubes in my mic pre. Replaced the standard Russian tubes with a pair of RCA vintage 6072's. Have a listen if you've got a minute?
http://www.divshare.com/download/8529975-08e
Any preference? First cut or second cut? If you don't hear any audible difference, that's also cool. Be good to get your impressions of tone colour etc.
Big thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Bishop Contributor

Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 38 Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boy, both sound really nice.
Full, rich, loud (are you compressing?)
From my vantage point, the NOS (if the 2nd) has just a touch more bottom-end.
What's your mic?
Later,
Jason _________________ ____________________
"Be like water my friend."
-Bruce Lee
Martial Artist & Philosopher |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper

Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan-O The Gates of Troy

Joined: 17 Jan 2005 Posts: 1638
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeffery,
He never said which was which. That being said; I prefer the second, also. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Test DC

Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 629 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
My understanding is that tubes need to be broken in. Have you broken in the NOS tubes yet? I hear only a very subtle difference.
I upgraded the tubes in my ART MPA Gold awhile back. If I can find the time, I'll try out my TLM-103 on the stock tube, a 1960's Mullard NOS tube, a Tung-Sol and a Ruby Tube. I'll post the results.
I can say for sure that upgrading the tube in my Rode NTK with an NOS Amperex has made a significant improvement. _________________ Best regards,
Tom Test
"The Voice You Trust"
www.tomtest.com
Last edited by Tom Test on Wed Sep 16, 2009 2:14 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jeffrey Kafer Assistant Zookeeper

Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 4931 Location: Location, Location!
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan-O wrote: | Jeffery,
He never said which was which. That being said; I prefer the second, also. |
True, and my assumption of the order of the tubes = the order listed in the filename. But for clarification, #2 seemed a little clearer. _________________ Jeff
http://JeffreyKafer.com
Voice-overload Web comic: http://voice-overload.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Eddie Eagle M&M
Joined: 23 Apr 2008 Posts: 2393
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Colin,
Long time no talk! Both sound pretty darn good. The second sounds a touch more crisp than the first. Great sound.
If you want someone to break in the tubes just send em on and I'll take hammer to em... Ohhhh. Break them IN, not just break em.
Best,
Eddie |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like 2...it's more focused and smoother. What is your preamp and mic?
On my ART MPA Gold, my NOS Siemens is smoother and more focused, but I actually prefer the accentuated highs and lows of the new production Tung Sol and the very flat mid-heavy new JJs after all the processing is said and done. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cheers for the input everyone. I thought I'd leave it for a day or so before I chimed back in.
The NOS tubes, as you guessed were on the second cut. Oh - thanks for the encouraging comments btw.
Not a huge difference on my monitors, but maybe more on yours. They do seem a little more open and detailed perhaps, and the dealer says that after a hundred hours or so they should get a little richer. Two schools of thought about this; one says that tubes need some burn in time; the other that when brand new they are as good as it'll get. I don't have enough experience to know but my hunch says they are gaining air and clarity as the week passes. Us tone junkies are habitual navel gazers aren't we?
One thing I'm sure of; the impact of NOS tubes on my particular mic pre is slight compared to the difference a NOS tube made on my mic. It really bloomed when I swapped in a NOS Amperex.
For anyone interested, the chain is Lawson L47 MP2, running into a Fearn VT1, EL8 Distressor and a touch of EQ from a modded Neve Portico.
Thanks again for lending me your ears - and big hi to Mr Eagle! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh - I almost forgot; for NOS tubes, I can thoroughly recommend the guy I've been dealing with; Christian Whitmore. Mail him at proaudiotubes@aol.com
Talk about holding my hand! His service has been above and beyond. Top guy. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tom Test DC

Joined: 23 Jan 2007 Posts: 629 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
I also worked with Christian Whitmore, and had the same very positive experience.
And Dayo, I also felt like the Amperex NOS tube that went into my Rode NTK made a much bigger improvement that the tubes I've put in my ART Gold MPA preamp. However, I will also say that it seems that the longer I use the NOS tubes on the preamp, the better they sound. So that is evidence that "breaking in" might actually help - though it just might be the power of suggestion, I'm embarrassed to say. _________________ Best regards,
Tom Test
"The Voice You Trust"
www.tomtest.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gp Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Guys Christian is a very good friend of mine. I am going to pass along the praise. He deserves it. He really is that good. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|