View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Adam Verner Contributore Level V

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 198 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:18 pm Post subject: To high pass or not to high pass? |
|
|
So I'm getting completely contradicting advice from two audio engineers on the question of using a High Pass Filter on my preamp (a grace m101).
There's a low-level "dreaded building hum" at times in the office building I'm in...mostly likely from the HVAC unit in the corner of the building. I have no control over it. Turning on the HPF on the preamp knocks it out completely. One audio engineer friend recommends recording with it on. Another says don't...it'll affect the sound of my voice too much.
In recording test tracks there is a slight difference between them, but it's pretty subtle.
From the Grace manual:
Quote: | "The high pass filter, sometimes referred to as a bass roll-off, starts at 75Hz. This 12dB/octave filter is optimized
for minimum phase shift. The most common uses for this are in situations where low-end rumble from mechani-
cal sources or wind are present, to reduce excessive proximity effect, or to simply help reign in excessive bass
during recording." |
Sounds like the ticket to me. What do you recommend? Is it just a case of audio engineers wanting the "rawest" file possible? _________________ Adam
************************************
Natural Voice
adamverner.com
adamverner.com/blog
twitter.com/adam_verner
************************************ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I always record with a HPF at about 80Hz for my corporate clients. I've got a sweepable HPF so I lower it to 40Hz for my non-corporate work.
There is so little frequency of the male voice picked up under 80Hz. Just do it.  _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Gambill Cinquecento

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Posts: 561 Location: King, NC 35mi SE of Mayberry
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yea do it.
I have several AKG’s both 414’s and 451EB’s that have role off switches that cut all below 75 Hz. On a regular basis I cut every thing below 40 – 75 in post. A lot of energy in the mix for no gain in performance.
So in the end you had one audio engineer that gave good advice and a person with an opinion. _________________ Esse quam videri "To be rather than to seem"
www.SaVoa.org No. 07000 Member AES  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adam Verner Contributore Level V

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 198 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the thoughts, friends!
Here's two samples, one with the HPF on, one with it off. Pretty obvious which is which:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3192550/this-one.wav
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3192550/or-this-one.wav
This is for audiobooks/narration, so not being mixed with anything else it might be more noticeable. _________________ Adam
************************************
Natural Voice
adamverner.com
adamverner.com/blog
twitter.com/adam_verner
************************************ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now, I can understand the problem that arises if we as talents use a HPF and then the post engineers use a HPF again...but they should be able to hear if they need to use it or not.
For my tastes, 100Hz is too high, 80Hz is as high as I'd go...but my prefered way to do it is actually remove everything (not just roll off) below 60Hz with the graphic EQ in Audition but leave everything above 60Hz alone. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mark Szabo
Joined: 07 Dec 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For all of Whitney's work there's HPF engaged. There is no useful content in her voice below around 100Hz, and it cleans up the low end of a track. There's no use in having it in there for voiceover work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adam Verner Contributore Level V

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 198 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So is a High Pass Filter on a pre-amp the same thing as a "Gate"?
Or is it a type of gate? I've only heard the term gates used in filters from the software end. _________________ Adam
************************************
Natural Voice
adamverner.com
adamverner.com/blog
twitter.com/adam_verner
************************************ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A HPF is like an EQ setting, whereas the gate is clamping down on the overall volume. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Adam Verner Contributore Level V

Joined: 04 Jan 2007 Posts: 198 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Lance!
You said in your earlier post:
Quote: | my prefered way to do it is actually remove everything (not just roll off) below 60Hz with the graphic EQ in Audition but leave everything above 60Hz alone. |
I use Audition (1.5) as well...could you describe that in more detail? Maybe even a screen shot of the settings? I assume you mean Effects -> Filters -> Graphic Equalizer. I'm just not sure of which sliders to touch or numbers to change....something will blow up, I'm sure of it. _________________ Adam
************************************
Natural Voice
adamverner.com
adamverner.com/blog
twitter.com/adam_verner
************************************ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|