VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Reading Website URLs

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mike Harrison
M&M


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 2029
Location: Equidistant from New York City and Philadelphia, along the NJ Shore

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:33 am    Post subject: Reading Website URLs Reply with quote

Here's a Happy New Year FYI to tuck away but keep handy:

I'm not sure it's a misconception of copywriters, producer/directors or voice talent, but I quite often hear website URLs misread. For example, a sponsor billboard on today's CBS 'Sunday Morning' was read: "...visit IBM dot com, backslash, innovation."

If in a piece of copy a URL is phonetically spelled out and contains the word 'backslash,' or if the '/' character appears and is misread as 'backslash,' potential customers who try to use the actual backslash character [ \ ] in their web browsers will receive an error and may mistakenly think the website is down. (The backslash character is not valid for HTML code.)

To a client who is trying to drive traffic to their website, a mistake in a URL is the same as an incorrect phone number or street address, resulting in lost potential sales.

This will be one of those times where we might very politely suggest to the producer/director that they try entering that URL in a browser to see whether it works. Hopefully, we will be seen as a hero - for having saved some potential sales and a re-do of the spot - and we'll score some brownie points!
_________________
Mike
Male Voice Over Talent
I have taken leave of my sensors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Don G.
King's Row


Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Posts: 1071
Location: MA

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, I've had that argument a few times, except it was not a recorded VO, but a credit to be read live. I made a note of it, told the powers that be (who dragged their feet in correcting it) and read it the right way. The fact that you heard it on a network program by big name sponsor is even more troubling.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lee Gordon
A Zillion


Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 6864
Location: West Hartford, CT

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whenever I encounter a similar situation, I usually say something like, "I may be wrong but but ..." and then offer to do it their way and my way "just for safety."

By the way, I may be wrong but I think "www.ibm.com\innovation" is a valid, working URL. (Actually, I'm not wrong; I tried it and it works, although it redirects you to a different URL with a couple of forward slashes.)
_________________
Lee Gordon, O.A.V.
Voice President of the United States
www.leegordonproductions.com
Twitter: @LeeGordonVoice
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mike Harrison
M&M


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 2029
Location: Equidistant from New York City and Philadelphia, along the NJ Shore

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 10:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dan: Yeah, I can see some people being reluctant to change. They're of the 'the client is always right' mindset.

Lee: I like your "I may be wrong, but..." approach very much. And, yes, I always offer to do an alternate read just so they have it. Also, it seems that some browsers do their own 'correcting' of URLs. My browser (Safari) reports that "The page cannot be displayed." I just read part of a blog where some programmers were discussing the issue. Syntax had always been that the slash [ / ] separated segments of a path or command string, but they complain that Microsoft somewhere along the line started using backslashes and has thus confused many people.
_________________
Mike
Male Voice Over Talent
I have taken leave of my sensors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bruce
Boardmeister


Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 7977
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I usually try to get clients to drop the WWW in front of web addresses and usually succeed, just like years ago I worked to get clients to drop the HTTP:// ahead of each address... but I always test them first. There was a time years ago when having the 3 w's or not made a difference. I also don't understand the need to say forward slash or back slash anymore because 99.99% of us instinctively type / for the word slash and not \ which a hard key to get to in normal typing and \ is only used for programming language, yes?

Of course the day is coming when we'll be ending a commercial saying something like, "next time you're in front of your computer just think 'Biscuit'!!"...because when you do biscuit.com will automatically appear, or if you think "Jolly Good Biscuit" the site biscuit.co.uk will pop up. Brilliant.

B
_________________
VO-BB Member #31 Enlisted June, 2005

I'm not a Zoo, but over the years I've played one on radio/TV. .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Deirdre
Czarina Emeritus


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 13023
Location: Camp Cooper

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Who was the idiot who first started saying "backslash" for a URL anyway?

Like Lee points out, many websites now have to create a page at the URL with the back slash character just to get poor benighted nitwits to the correct page.

THE BACK SLASH IS A LIE.
_________________
DBCooperVO.com
IMDB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jef Brown
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've been designing websites since '96 and VO long before that, and the whole "how to verbally convey a URL" has always been a huge issue. I always tell my web clients that when they are choosing a URL they should consider how easy (or difficult) it would be to tell to someone over the phone, and to keep it simple. But invariably they come up with names that require a hyphen (or should we call it a dash), an underscore, abbreviations (like inc.) and is the www part even necessary? I had a VO client who was insisting that I say h t t p colon backslash backslash before the web address because his IT guy said it wouldn't work without it, and then got ticked because I couldn't get the read in time because it took so long to read the web address (oh yeah he wanted it mentioned that way twice in the spot). Despite how pervasive the web has become, there is a frightening ignorance of terminology and also the fact that technically correct terminology is often trumped by a generally used term. For example the term "URL" will glaze the eyes of many a web user, but call it a www address and they're ok. I've adopted a policy of at least tying to save VO clients from themselves. I read addresses as I know they should be read and are most likely to be understood, I use "slash" instead of backslash or forwardslash if necessary, but there really is no way of saving someone who insists on having a URL that is 3 separate words joined by underscores and are apparently oblivious that the underscores are a necessary element of the address ("can't you just say the 3 words dot com?") NO, IT WON'T WORK!! Angry
So far, no one has questioned my corrections, I'm betting that if it was discussed around the board table, somebody spoke up and said "you know what, I think he's right". But I'm not completely unbendable, if a client INSISTED I do it the wrong way hey, I tried.
Back to top
Mike Harrison
M&M


Joined: 03 Nov 2007
Posts: 2029
Location: Equidistant from New York City and Philadelphia, along the NJ Shore

PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Who was the idiot who first started saying "backslash" for a URL anyway?


It was undoubtedly some HMTL geek who, as an early dweeb, had fooled around with DOS and saw that backslashes are actually used in path strings:

"The backslash symbol (\) is used as a separator between folder and file names in DOS, Windows and OS/2 when the full path to a file is written out. For example, the path c:\cde\cde.exe points to the CDE.EXE file in the CDE folder on the C: drive."

Working as a radio Production Director, one will ultimately have direct contact with clients who are on strict budgets and, therefore, have as their IT-person some guy who makes websites. Their 'expert' needs to justify his position and so will give the client the guidance he's (ahem) paying for. As most local radio spots have too much copy to fit in their allotted time anyway, I always test the most stripped-down version of a client's URL (OK, web address) to see whether it works. If it does, I just tell the client the edited version works, and there's no time for the full version anyway. (You did want your phone number in here five times, too, didn't you?). It's also great when a client chooses a domain name and/or email address that have to be verbally spelled out to be understood. (Well, I'm sorry; there's no more time left. You bought a :30 spot and the first fifteen seconds were taken up by your website address, and the last ten seconds were for the disclaimer.)

True, some websites still do require the www prefix, but in many cases, web browsers will automatically add it if needed. I never use http://www. when typing URLs into my browser.

There really is no need to say 'forward' slash, because most people are accustomed to typing everyday text (not code), and there is no use for the backslash character. The standard slash character is assumed... or, at least, WAS assumed until that mystery schmoe started saying 'backslash' when he meant 'slash.' The self-professed 'expert' created confusion among those who didn't know any better. And yes, as far as I've been able to determine, the backslash character is only used in programming language. It is not a valid HTML character.

And, technically, it's a hyphen in URLs, but most people will find 'dash' easier to grasp. In typography, there are two dash characters: the en-dash – (as wide as a lowercase 'n' and which could be mistaken for a hyphen in some typefaces), and the em-dash — (as wide as... well, you guessed it.) Luckily, for most people, those characters don't appear on standard keyboards.

I'm thinking 'Jolly Good Biscuit' right now. I'll let you know if Poppin' Fresh (the Pillsbury Doughboy) shows up.
_________________
Mike
Male Voice Over Talent
I have taken leave of my sensors.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mandy Nelson
MMD


Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 2914
Location: Wicked Mainah

PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I got one today that had the backslash in the URL. I recorded both versions in case but later checked the address and it redirected to the proper forward slash and worked just fine so I edited out the forward slash and sent it along. I did correct this line, though: due to heavy call volume you may have to wait for an extended time to speal to a representative.
_________________
006 member of the Sisterhood of the Traveling Mic. Bonded by sound.

Manfillappsoc: The Mandy and Philip mutual appreciation Society. Who's in your network?

Have you seen my mic closet? ~ me to my future husband
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group