View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:26 am Post subject: Amek 9098 or Red 6 |
|
|
I recently got my mind set on getting a UA TwinFinity. But, some deals have just come up that I thought I'd ponder before making a purchase. A studio is selling both a Amek 9098 EQ (Rack version) and a Focusrite Red 6. I googled both and they seem to share a completely extreme love/hate response . What are your opinions on these 2?
The Amek is about $600 more than the Red.
I found contradicting threads about which is cleaner and which is more coloured.
DAMMMN! i was sooo close to starting some threads that had absolutely nothing to with mics or preamps...but now I have completely forgotten what they were about...
Then again, if they had nothing to do with mics or pres they probably weren't important. _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I would pass on the Amek.
The Red is nice but you can do better with the Golden Age Pre 73, for the money that is. The 73 is a Neve style pre too. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
I just misses a used GAP 73 here. I had my mind set on the 710 at that stage, and when I decided to get the GAP it was gone. Bad side they are not common here (I cannot find the local dealer) Good side is that it was going for same price as new one in the US... Some product prices are really skewed here.
The Red 6 is three times the price now. But would you really put the GAP in the same level as the Red? Same studio has a green voicemaster too, but as far as I can make out, these were the predecessors of the icky platinum range. _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Chameleon Labs pres are very similar to the GAP pres. Take a gander at those too. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to, but the Chameleons are 5x the price, and no local distributors again!! There is seriously a lack of choice here. I think once a few people use a product, everyone else jumps on it and that small group dictates what comes in.
Also...I am looking at whatever comes up in the used market, which is also pretty small. I think I need to go across to Singapore. The city state has more recording studios there than Taiwan has across the whole island.
I have narrowed my choices to:
1. Get the Red 6.
2. Get the UA TwinFinity and have enough left to get new monitors.
3. Buy the NightPro EQ3 they have and drown myself in that Celine Dion-esque airiness. Seriously...has anyone ever used these for VO? _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Living Culture writes: "Seriously...has anyone ever used these for VO?" |
Yes.
Personally speaking, unless you are made of money - neither of the choices are great.
I like the Red for vocals (singing) an some woodwinds. For VO think anothe3r direction. The NightPro is too airy and stark. The TwinFinity is w-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-y overpriced (as are the other two but not to the same degree).
Gear-itis seems to have got hold of you. Keep your money under your mattress and make what equipment you have work for your talent; not the other way around.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
UA needs to look at the MPA Gold (or MPA I and drop their Twin Finity price to about $399. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Personally speaking, unless you are made of money - neither of the choices are great |
To put it into perspective, since TW prices are not the same (mostly more expensive) I'll convert costs.
Used Red 6 - US$1350
New TwinFinity - US$1017
I was joking about the NightPro, as I do think its a one-trick-pony.
At this price, do you still consider the Red overpriced? The green voicemaster is going for About US$1000, but that is basically Platinum as far as I understand.
Quote: | Gear-itis seems to have got hold of you. Keep your money under your mattress and make what equipment you have work for your talent; not the other way around. |
I am a chronic sufferer...But I am genuinely not happy with my current pres. The sound is mediocre and they have no power for SM-7(I should post the clip I recorded tonight...DBX-386 at MAX...for little bit of signal)
UA needs to look at the MPA Gold
Do you put these in the same ballpark? I never used the MPA, but I considered it inline with what I have. [/quote] _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh geez...I think you'll be happy with most pres over a 386. I don't mean to sound gear-bashing, I just think the consensus on those is pretty low. I've only used one once years ago and it wasn't good. A 286 should work, though.
If you're looking to drive a SM7, get a nice clean preamp. The True P-Solos are good for dynamics, and I'd recommend my speck 5.0 if you could get your hands on one of those. John Hardy, Grace, True, Daking, Great River - get a good SS preamp...stay away from these tube-distortion units for dynamics, the gain has to be too high. I would think you could even be done with a Mackie Onyx board and be happy. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
"A 286 should work, though".
FUnny, I wanted one of those a while back and opted for Presonus Studio Channel only because the 286's were out of stock indefinitely.
"- get a good SS preamp"
Thats my intention.
"True P-Solos, speck 5.0, John Hardy, Grace, True, Daking, Great River"
Only Grace is available here. I don't want a Grace though. I want something with at least a little character for using on vocalists too. I tried tracking down dealers for some, closest I got was Summit dealers saying that they would be glad to help, but that was last reply I ever got...
If I can't find anything used, I might opt for an SSL ALpha X channel strip. Reasonably priced and have a bit of SSL character.
"I would think you could even be done with a Mackie Onyx board and be happy."
I believe that. I have had a few sessions where I have just used the Saffire LE's onboard pres and been happier.
I was looking at a Mackie SR24, which has Onyx pres if I remember correctly. Not that I have any need for a 24 channel desk, but my o3D has been acting up....and it would just look so cool Or if I wanted quality over quantity...there is an Allen & Heath GS3....
Gearitis..Nah...The only reason I do this in the first place is to twiddle with knobs and faders and push shiny buttons. _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lance Blair M&M

Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 2281 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, if you're doing production work, just get a nice board and have different microphones for the character since you use different voices. A SM7 is an SM7...it has its own wonderful character. If you're recording different people I'd say have a nice clean standard board and then different mics: that choice and mic placement will give you more options. Forget about stand alone preamps. _________________ Skype: globalvoiceover
and now, http://lanceblairvo.com the blog is there now too! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Yeah, if you're doing production work, just get a nice board and have different microphones for the character since you use different voices. A SM7 is an SM7...it has its own wonderful character. If you're recording different people I'd say have a nice clean standard board and then different mics: that choice and mic placement will give you more options. Forget about stand alone preamps. |
Thats what I would like to do really. But I am not doing much production work these days. Mainly post production where everything is done ITB. VO is almost the only thing I record these days. So I still would like at least one "golden channel".
Later I do want to get a console, so I can do more OTB in post, but not that important now.
FYI, I phoned my favorite store today. They said any of of the Hardy's etc. would be possible to import, but the prices including all the costs involved of shipping a single item from a company would be on par with just buying a better brand.
I also costed the SSL Alpha Channel. It is the same price as the Red 6. Any opinions on these yet? Many opinions are toward it being a cold clean unit. _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
To put a simple answer to your question - Yes. The pre's are over priced.
If you choose an MPA Gold - change the tubes. Do not settle for an inexpensive set of tubes - spend few bucks on the right set for the job. MPA's are, in my opinion, an under-rated Pre. (Cavaet: they have a few quirks such as cheap knobs and switches - but they can be replaced easily.)
Pre's are all about clarity and power. The latter comes from how well the tubes are driven and the cleanliness comes from how much power is given to the tube and how the clean the power is in relation to the gain. Colour comes from the tube and how the power effects the internal components including the transformer circuit and other essential parts.
Since you do more production than the recording side - consider a Channel strip (although I not a big fan of CS's for VO). More bang for your buck and they can be driven harder (even to distortion) without too much pain.
As for an SM7, as a dynamic mic it's a good tool to have available Where the frequency response rolls off around 16k and slightly increases in the mid's - the SM7B is good for radio broadcasters and certain other vocal situations requiring a solid workhorse. Would I use the Shure for an everyday, go-to, money making microphone? NO.
An SSL is always a good choice.
With today's technology, consider going board-less or at least consider a controller for your DAW; letting your equipment work for you instead of against you.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Living Culture Contributore Level V

Joined: 14 Oct 2007 Posts: 189 Location: Taipei
|
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | To put a simple answer to your question - Yes. The pre's are over priced. |
I think the same is true with most things in the recording chain. Lots of high-priced toys that each make it it sound a tad better. Sturm and drang I think it is.
Quote: | . MPA's are, in my opinion, an under-rated Pre. |
I am trying not to get another "good for its price" pre. I don't want to end up with a rack of good, but mediocre pres. Ironically, I had just finished reading a thread on a MPA/Alpha Channel shootout on GS when I saw your post. Unfortunately the soundfiles were gone, but the thread convinced me that the SSL was the better choice.
Quote: | Pre's are all about clarity and power. The latter comes from how well the tubes are driven and the cleanliness comes from how much power is given to the tube and how the clean the power is in relation to the gain. Colour comes from the tube and how the power effects the internal components including the transformer circuit and other essential parts. |
Thanks, that is interesting. Any idea if different tubes can lower a noise floor? I still intend swapping out the tubes in the 386 for stereo recordings.
Quote: | As for an SM7, as a dynamic mic it's a good tool to have available Where the frequency response rolls off around 16k and slightly increases in the mid's - the SM7B is good for radio broadcasters and certain other vocal situations requiring a solid workhorse. Would I use the Shure for an everyday, go-to, money making microphone? NO. |
Its fast becoming my goto. Not that it sounds better, just seems I'm getting lots of work that calls for that sound.
Quote: | An SSL is always a good choice. |
I was raised on 80's glam rock. Most of my favorites were probably recorded on SSL's.
Quote: | With today's technology, consider going board-less or at least consider a controller for your DAW; letting your equipment work for you instead of against you. |
Thats why I got o3D. I use it as a DAW contoller and monitor mixer. Unfortunately Cubase does not have presets for it, so I had to use SySX which bypasses the MIDI REMOTE function on the desk. Not being able to switch between mixer and controller has given me so many headaches...Nothing that can't be fixed, I just haven't had the guts to do it yet. I have looked at dedicated DAW controllers, but again, they are really overpriced. I could just use the o3D as a dedicated controller and dig out my Behringer for monitoring. _________________ Mandarin Chinese Voiceovers & Localization
http://lcmsmedia.com
http://imagesbykenny.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|