VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RE20 or SM7B for a less than perfect room?
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear !
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tom Test
DC


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 629
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 1:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Personally, I've never tried a dynamic mic that I've really liked for VO. Over the years, I have owned a Shure SM7B, RE-20, Heil PR-40, Sennheiser e935, and a Blue EnCore 200. All have been sold off. All were tried out using a MAckie Onyx preamp (good and clean), or my old Speck 5.0 (also sold).

I currently own an MD-441 and the Heil PR-30, and so far neither is floating my boat and may well end up on eBay (or here...). And I've tried these through good preamps: my GAP-73 and my dbx286A. There's a distinctive sound that dynamics have that condensers don't - I can't quite put it in words - that I simply do not like on my own mid-range male voice. YMMV. (If you go to tomtest.com and listen to my Corporate or e-Learning demos, all the tracks were recorded at my home studio, using mostly a Gefell M930 or a highly-modded Rode NTK tube mic. I just didn't like the sound I got with my MD-441).

If room tone is an issue, why not try a Harlan Hogan Porta-Booth sort of solution (only $125 or much less if you make your own), and use a good condenser?
_________________
Best regards,
Tom Test
"The Voice You Trust"
www.tomtest.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
There's a distinctive sound that dynamics have that condensers don't - I can't quite put it in words
This is called color. The very nature of the dynamic microphones design lends itself to this coloring. I've never been bothered by this, because it's what I expect. As a matter of fact this colorization is heard on most all television animation from the 70's to the 90's.

For less-than ideal acoustical environment an dynamic mic is a good choose. If you need a condenser, then your only option is a shotgun mic, such as the 416, or the Schoeps CMIT 5U.

As for me the porta-booth is more of a problem than it is worth - it brings it's own resonance to the party, and who want's to work in the confines of a little bitty box. Not I.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dayo
Cinquecento


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Sommer wrote:
Well, as I asked above: What is it that you are doing in the control room that you can't or don't want to do in the booth?

Our understanding for the problem will help us get to the solution.

If you need to work in a less than perfect room you're that room is going to become a part of the mix, even with a 416.


In my control room I can get my hands on my outboad and mangle the sound as much as I please - rather than taking trips to and fro. The fun stuff. It's really only for doing high energy reads, imaging sessions, game show type announcements and so on.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Dayo
Cinquecento


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 2:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Mike Sommer"]
Quote:

As for me the porta-booth is more of a problem than it is worth - it brings it's own resonance to the party, and who want's to work in the confines of a little bitty box. Not I.


Agree about the Porta Booth. I've used it once but I'm afraid it can't break or even bend the laws of physics. Even with a 416 I found it, um ... er.... well... boxy!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dayo wrote:
In my control room I can get my hands on my outboad and mangle the sound as much as I please - rather than taking trips to and fro.


Just a bit of insight - If you're looking at the waveform or twiddling the knobs while you are voicing a piece of copy, you are not in full actor mode. When you split your attention, something is always going to suffer. It would be best to get your equipment and sound dialed in before you start, and forget it. When the acting hat is on - act. When that's done, then you can put the engineers hat on.

Quote:
It's really only for doing high energy reads, imaging sessions, game show type announcements and so on.


You're right to be wanting to move toward a good dynamic mic and the SM-7 would be a rock solid choice.

You should also consider treating your control room area anyway. You don't need to go heavy with it, just knock down the early reflections, and as much of the room ambiance as you can.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dayo
Cinquecento


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Location: UK

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Sommer wrote:


Just a bit of insight - If you're looking at the waveform or twiddling the knobs while you are voicing a piece of copy, you are not in full actor mode. When you split your attention, something is always going to suffer.


I concur. But it ain't that kind of work.

Mike Sommer wrote:

You should also consider treating your control room area anyway. You don't need to go heavy with it, just knock down the early reflections, and as much of the room ambiance as you can.


Yep, it's pretty well treated. Quite a bit of bass trapping too. It's just not so controlled as the booth and an LDC shows that up. Do you think my Great River pre will have enough gain for the SM7B? last time I tried one I only had the Fearn and it really couldn't grab it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Diane Maggipinto
Spreading Snark Worldwide


Joined: 03 Mar 2006
Posts: 6679
Location: saul lay seetee youtee

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 6:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i should say that my re-20 and shure are used for telephony. yours ain't that kind of work, either, dayo but hey! whatevs. Hobo Happy
_________________
sitting at #8, though not as present as I'd like to be. Hello!

www.d3voiceworks.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Do you think my Great River pre will have enough gain for the SM7B? last time I tried one I only had the Fearn and it really couldn't grab it.


The Great River is 60 dB of output, I like 65dB or more.

The Grace 101 or the GAP73 might be better bet. I have not problem driving my RE15 with it.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.


Last edited by Mike Sommer on Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vance Elderkin
Contributor IV


Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Thu Jun 23, 2011 2:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Both quality mics (and both pretty low output mics, too). I'd say the major difference I've found (other than the price difference) is proximity effect. The SM7B has a LOT of proximity effect when you move close to it. Useful for some reads, I suppose. The RE-20 really doesn't have that much at all, even working close.

I have a few vintage SM7s (which I rebuilt with new capsules) that I use on occasion (like when I voice one of those screamer used car ads), but they're not my primary mics.

Whichever one you get, get a STURDY mic stand that'll hold some weight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
captain54
Lucky 700


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 744
Location: chicago

PostPosted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mike Sommer wrote:
Just a bit of insight - If you're looking at the waveform or twiddling the knobs while you are voicing a piece of copy, you are not in full actor mode. When you split your attention, something is always going to suffer. It would be best to get your equipment and sound dialed in before you start, and forget it. When the acting hat is on - act. When that's done, then you can put the engineers hat on.

.


Re-reading this discussion, and have wondered about this very thing from time to time.

It might be interesting to note if there is really any dramatic difference between using recording software that displays the waveform vs the non-display waveform software.

Let's also keep in mind that one can also minimimize most or all software so that it's invisible once you start recording..

the non-display waveform software (correct me if Im wrong)

Sound forge
Twisted Wave
Amadeus
Audacity

the wave display software

Protools
Audition
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
mediaking
Contributor


Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 33
Location: Earth...this week

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 2:28 pm    Post subject: RE-20 for me... Reply with quote

The RE-20 has been my goto mic, because I loved it's look and sound. I don't have a treated room, but have sounded quite good with simple gating.
_________________
www.jclsound.com
Hear It Right. Now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
georgethetech
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1878
Location: Topanga, CA

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2011 11:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Captain54, you are referring to software that doesn't display a waveform while tracking?
The only ones in that list that don't are SoundForge and Amadeus Pro.

Thanks, Mike for reminding people that we can't truly multitask when acting. Your performance will suffer if you are keeping an eyeball on a VU. Set it and forget it...
_________________
If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
captain54
Lucky 700


Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 744
Location: chicago

PostPosted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

soundgun wrote:
Captain54, you are referring to software that doesn't display a waveform while tracking?
The only ones in that list that don't are SoundForge and Amadeus Pro.

...


thanks for the clarification...I have to admit, there was a certain freedom back in the day of hitting a button on a tape machine and forgetting it was there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Dayo
Cinquecento


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 544
Location: UK

PostPosted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for the input. Tested a few dynamics but in the end I decided that the best mic for this room was a MKH 416. It actually sounds great in here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear ! All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group