View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 10:42 am Post subject: JJ Audio modded MXL Cr24 mic test - Updated file |
|
|
Here's a sample of JJ Audio's modded MXL Cr24 with their premium capsule and electronics mod. Opinions?
I like it well enough but have a hard time having a non-biased opinion of my own voice on a mic, like many. Not to mention my room needs some serious help in the low-mids so I don't trust my monitoring completely.
Thanks!
www.vocalvoodoo.com/JJ_Audio_modded_MXL_Cr24 _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com
Last edited by Vocalvoodoo on Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:47 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Campbell DC

Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 621
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like the sound. It has a nice presence that cuts through. As a producer, I think all voice-overs need some processing. I think this would process well. No vices.
We're you using the high pass filter on the mic? I have the older MXL 2003, not the A model. It's a really nice sounding mic for the cost. Mine seems to have a little more down low, that's why I asked about the HP filter.
How did it sound before the mod? _________________ www.asapaudio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rob Ellis M&M

Joined: 01 Aug 2006 Posts: 2385 Location: Detroit
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry, Josh, not a fan of the sound on this one.
Can't really list the whys and whynots but just not feelin it on this particular mic. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It sounds pedestrian, and rather dull. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
SkinnyJohnny Backstage Pass

Joined: 12 Aug 2007 Posts: 462 Location: Asheville, NC
|
Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2011 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say stick with the 416! _________________ John Weeks Voice Overs
www.johnweeksvoiceovers.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the input guys!
@Bill: No low cut. The lack of low end is positioning which I'm still experimenting with. I'm in a new room so I'm still trying to find the best place to record in this room. Before the mod it was even more thin and peaky sounding. I can't find any of the recordings I had of it before modding. It sounded pretty bad, IMO. Maybe this is a case of trying to polish a turd.
I'm with you Rob, I'm just not feeling it. Mike, agreed. I'm trying to like it so I don't feel like I wasted money, but maybe I just have to accept the fact.
Here is another file.
www.vocalvoodoo.com/Cr24-2.wav
I tried to find the most balanced spot in this room frequency wise. I'm telling you, I'm realizing even more how important proper room treatment is. While I do have super-chunks and 704 traps in the corners along with the first reflection points treated, there is still much more work to be done. Move the mic an inch and the sound can change quite drastically.
With that said, luckily one of the GIK Acoustics guys are local so he's going to come over and help me set everything up correctly in addition to putting up more traps and panels if needed.
EDIT: I want to add one more thing. The capsule is turned sveral degrees so it's off-center. I'm assuming that could cause some "weirdness" in the sound by creating unintended reflections in the head-basket? _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vocalvoodoo wrote: |
With that said, luckily one of the GIK Acoustics guys are local so he's going to come over and help me set everything up correctly in addition to putting up more traps and panels if needed. | What are the dimensions of your room. Make a drawing and take some pictures and post them, so I can see. What you are saying is typical for most small rooms.
What you have done is pretty good for listening, and with what you are describing about mic positions your area is still under treated. Your listening positions are being colored too, but because of the way our brain works we don't notice it as much- at least not until we listen to it through the ear or a mic. . In my travels what I've found is that most rooms need 80% to 90% of the wall area treated for the purpose of VO.
Quote: | The capsule is turned sveral degrees so it's off-center. I'm assuming that could cause some "weirdness" in the sound by creating unintended reflections in the head-basket? |
It very well could be. The capsule should be facing the open part of the basket. You may even note that there are more than one screen in the mic head basket. These screens alone will alter the way a mic will sound.
IF you are brave and have a carful steady hand, you maybe able to open the mic and adjust or turn the mount. Or call Mike. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I should have some time tonight to take pics and make a drawing. I appreciate you looking at them, Mike.
I took the mic apart and turned the capsule, but it went right back to where it was after I put it back together. It is an MXL after all, so I'm not surprised. I suppose at that price point you're not paying for great QC! _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vocalvoodoo wrote: |
I took the mic apart and turned the capsule, but it went right back to where it was after I put it back together. |
Try using baling wire.
"Kidding of course" _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I tried the bailing wire but that didn't help. I also lowered the capsule a bit. Unfortunately that didn't help bring out low end at all.  _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bish 3.5 kHz

Joined: 22 Nov 2009 Posts: 3738 Location: Lost in the cultural wasteland of Long Island
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting information here. I have the Cr24/2003a and was at one time considering the OktavaMod upgrade... but the cost of the mod is not insignificant (best part of $400). I got to thinking that would buy me a lot of OC703 & burlap! The last time I applied Mike's oft repeated advice to my recording space, the improvements were noticeable. I'm realizing that the best $400 mod to a $200 mic is in the room, and not in the mic.
Cheers
peter _________________ Bish a.k.a. Bish
Smoke me a kipper... I'll be back for breakfast.
I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls... I will not feed the trolls. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2011 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wasn't able to snap picks tonight and get all the dimensions of the room. It's a funky "L" shaped basement room with lots of nooks and crannies, but will be able to get all dimensions today and draw up something that is hopefully halfway passable.
If interested, frequency response and waterfall graph pics from Fuzz Measure are below. IK's ARC mic was used at the mix position pointed at the ceiling.
Frequency Response
(blue line is the right monitor)
Waterfall _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alright, Mike. Here's a link to the pics and sketch with dimensions.
pics
The pics are a little dark (phone camera), and most all my panels are black so it's a bit hard to tell what's what.
The front corners both have a 2'x4'x4" OC 703 panel straddling the top of the corner with 2'-9" of 26" across super-chunked acoustic cotton on the bottom of the corner. The cotton is covered in each corner by a OC 703 2'x4'x2" panel.
The window is covered by 3, side by side, OC 703 2'x4'x4" panels.
The panels on the front side walls are OC 703 2'x4'x2" panels.
Both panels on the fireplace are OC 703 2'x4'x4".
The cloud is four pieces of OC 703 2'x4'x2" panels sitting on top of a 4'x4'x1" piece of OC 705.
Back wall has 4 OC 703 1'x4'x4" panels. I might actually use those to treat the support beam the runs acros the ceiling behind me.
And finally, the pieces on the guitar wall are spare acoustic cotton I had which are 1'x3.5'x3".
When I need to record, I just pull down one of the window panels, put it on a stand. Along with the existing panel that's on a stand, I create a 'V' with the mic in the middle. That actually does a really nice job of killing the reflections from the little area by the bathroom and stairs.
It's not a pretty set-up, but it's a rental house so I can't "do it right" yet.
One final thing, the opposite sides of both the back and right walls are unfinished, so I was thinking of filling them in with acoustic cotton. _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mike Sommer A Hundred Dozen

Joined: 05 May 2008 Posts: 1222 Location: Boss Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2011 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're water falls tell the story. You need a ton more treatment.
You're front corner traps are not nearly thick enough. You need a minimum of 6". It just so happens that if you have 6" of 2x4' panels straddling the corner you have enough to make superchunks.
The chunk in the rear corner looks like cotton. This material my not be dense enough. Even as a listening space there is not enough treatment in this room.
There is a lot of comb filter eco in the graphs and some deep nulls.
What mic did you use to test this room??
Over all you need a lot more treatment and a plan of attack. _________________ The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/
Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vocalvoodoo Contributor IV
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 106 Location: St. Louis
|
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used the measurement mic that comes with IK Multimedia's ARC. (Bad investment, despite the glowing reviews, IMO)
Yeah, it's in pretty bad shape. Am I correct in assuming that the foundation walls make the problem even worse?
I've also noticed that when I push the volume of my monitors to moderate levels the stereo image shifts to the right.
I want to get this fixed, but I'm probably not going the DIY route this time. Too much time spent and prefab just looks a lot better. While it costs more going prefab, the extra cost is well worth it to me this time around.
No wonder each mic I buy never sounds quite right, not to mention mixing in this room, and my previous one, is an absolute PITA!
What do you suggest for treatment? _________________ Josh Mahler
http://www.vocalvoodoo.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|