 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mark Szabo
Joined: 07 Dec 2009 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
anthonyVO wrote: | Most Waves plugins support sidechaining, but sorry to hear it won't work for your setup. It's insane how 64-bit isn't widely supported in *and* out of the pro audio world. |
Sadly the case. I have x64 everything else, but I'm stuck with 32-bit software because no one wants to put the money into recompiling and retesting their software...until Protools does offers an x64 platform.
Damn you Avid! (shakes fist) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Benjamin Stovall Been Here Awhile

Joined: 13 Dec 2011 Posts: 250 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I'm a little late to the discussion as I just joined, but I really like the FabFilter plugins. I recommend giving their Pro-C plugin a whirl. It comes in AU, VST, VST 3, AAX and RTAS formats for Mac OS X and Windows, has super fast attack times, support for x64-bit and side-chaining. Better still, you can download a free trial.
I really dig their plugins. The interfaces are phenomenal too, which is a big plus. I also use their Pro-L (Limiter) and Pro-Q (EQ) plug-ins quite a lot.
You'll find the compression plugin here:
http://www.fabfilter.com/products/pro-c.php |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fast attack times on v/o often sound just plain awful to my ears, making for clacky, clunky consonants and a sound that's often smaller than life.
Mike Sommer turned me on to the long, lazy attack of an La2a and I've never looked back.
Just my 2p _________________ Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Benjamin Stovall Been Here Awhile

Joined: 13 Dec 2011 Posts: 250 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
DanG Contributor III

Joined: 25 Aug 2006 Posts: 89 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: Mon Dec 26, 2011 12:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, if you want to run all your 32 bit plugins in the 64 bit enviorment you will need this, http://jstuff.wordpress.com/jbridge/ I just bought it last week $20 and I have all my 32 bit plugins including all my Waves plugins working in 64 bit(brand new computer). I like to work in 64 bit since I can use all my ram, 8 gigs and not be stuck on just 4 gigs of ram that 32 bit provides and I can run all 4 cores on 64 bit. It works with Cubase. I run Studio One Pro V2 and its seemless intergration with S1 Pro. 64 bit runs so much faster and smoother. I never have to work in the 32 bit enviorment again. I could not be happier with my purchase of JBridge. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jordanreynolds Contributor II

Joined: 26 Mar 2011 Posts: 58 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I felt like this thread was new and relevant enough to reply on. I wanted to see what compressor plugins other VO talent were using out there and found this!
A few people in the thread suggested using the LA2A and 1176 plugin emulations out there.
IK Multimedia has emulation versions of both of these compressors and they are actually very credible to the audio community. They've won awards and are used by many top end engineers. They are called the White 2A and the Black 76.
They are having this INSANE deal right now where you buy their T-Racks Deluxe package of plugins (9 or so great sounding plugins) and you get the White 2A and the Black 76 for FREE. It's only $199 for new customers or $99 for existing. And guess what, IK even suggested this, you can buy one of the dozens of $5 iphone/ipad a s and then qualify for the Crossgrade price of $99! (This is what I did). Just create a free IK multimedia account, buy an IOS a , open the a , and register it using your IK account credentials. The T-Racks deluxe is usually $400 and the Black/White plugins are usually $99 each. That's $600 worth of high quality plugins for $99. It's insane.
http://www.ikmultimedia.com/Main.html?deluxepromo/index.php
This Promo ENDS TODAY!!
The T-Racks Deluxe package has 9 great plugins and the White 2A and the Black 76 sound so gooey and smooth. I love them. I've been A/B'ing them for hours the past few days to see what kind of VO reads they are optimal for.
With my voice I found that the White 2A is best for slower, warmer, sensual reads. The Black 76 is best for promo, higher pitched, aggressive in your face reads. And I'm still going to use my trusty Waves Renaissance Compressor plugin for the most clear/transparent compression.
Anyways, no I do not have any affiliation with IK Multimedia. Nor is that link I gave you give me any credits or anything. I just LOVE these new plugins I got for such a crazy price.
Oh and they have 64-bit support .
For those who are already using these (or other LA2A / 1176 plugins) what kind of compression are you usually applying? i.e. 3db of gain reduction, LA2A on narrative reads, etc). _________________ http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Love T-racks for mastering, it is not VST however.
I like the DirectX plugs in Sony products, Wave Hammer is great, again sadly, it is not VST. That said, write your own VST, it is not as difficult as it sounds and you can use DirectX plugs or whatever in a wraparound container configuration.
OK, sorry for the promo, I hope this is going to be for Mastering, not recording VO. Sometimes a tiny, tiny, tiny bit of limiting may be required with some strong voices, but overall, clean audio is best to work with in Post.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I swear by the Waves RennVox. Its the best UREI 1176 emulator I've ever heard and is insanely easy to adjust and tweak. Also includes a Gate..
You can purchase the single plug from Waves for $49. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sounddguy Contributor IV

Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Posts: 100 Location: Atlanta, GA USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I like my 1176 universal plug in. I use it between the mic pre and the computer input. Of course it cost in the four figure range rather than 3. <G>
Does anyone have the hard ware version, and if so, have you done any
mods to it? Especially from Alactronics, Inc. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jordanreynolds Contributor II

Joined: 26 Mar 2011 Posts: 58 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frank F wrote: | Love T-racks for mastering, it is not VST however.
I like the DirectX plugs in Sony products, Wave Hammer is great, again sadly, it is not VST. That said, write your own VST, it is not as difficult as it sounds and you can use DirectX plugs or whatever in a wraparound container configuration.
OK, sorry for the promo, I hope this is going to be for Mastering, not recording VO. Sometimes a tiny, tiny, tiny bit of limiting may be required with some strong voices, but overall, clean audio is best to work with in Post.
Frank F |
Frank: When T-racks was released many years ago (over a decade I believe) it was initially a standalone application. However, they converted the tools into a plugin format many years ago. They've also added additional processors and plugins over time. They are all available as a stand alone application or VST, AU, and RTAS.
They are also mixing AND mastering tools. They were first used as mastering tools but that has changed. http://www.ikmultimedia.com/t-racks/features/
captain54: I love the RennVox too but, on my voice, I find that it really strips the lows and low-mid presence. It makes it bright and crisp but I'm usually not going for that. I prefer the RennComp instead. But I do love using the RennVox on vocals (when mixing music). I'm glad it works well for your VO work though! _________________ http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cyclometh King's Row

Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1051 Location: Olympia, WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey, this thread is still going, cool. I got some updates from Waves via email, it looks like they now support 64-bit on their plugins. Haven't gone to check it out yet.
The reason I was looking for these plugins was to be able to make my editing process faster by sidechaining in a room tone track to allow me to just clip out things I didn't want. Turned out there were better ways to do it, but it was still an interesting experiment. _________________ Corey "Vox Man" Snow
http://voxman.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jordanreynolds Contributor II

Joined: 26 Mar 2011 Posts: 58 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cyclometh wrote: | Hey, this thread is still going, cool. I got some updates from Waves via email, it looks like they now support 64-bit on their plugins. Haven't gone to check it out yet.
The reason I was looking for these plugins was to be able to make my editing process faster by sidechaining in a room tone track to allow me to just clip out things I didn't want. Turned out there were better ways to do it, but it was still an interesting experiment. |
Now that's an interesting idea! What are the "better" ways to accomplish this that keep the workflow efficient? _________________ http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
captain54 Lucky 700
Joined: 30 Jan 2006 Posts: 744 Location: chicago
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jordanreynolds wrote: |
captain54: I love the RennVox too but, on my voice, I find that it really strips the lows and low-mid presence. It makes it bright and crisp but I'm usually not going for that. I prefer the RennComp instead. But I do love using the RennVox on vocals (when mixing music). I'm glad it works well for your VO work though! |
The RennVox and the RennComp are identical, except for the added Gate in the RennVox. if you overuse or underuse the Gate, it can mess with the lows and low mids |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jordanreynolds Contributor II

Joined: 26 Mar 2011 Posts: 58 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh wow, really?? I could have sworn I heard a difference between the two and that's without using the gate feature. I'm not trying to be argumentative but do have a source that states Rencomp and RenVox use the exact same algorithm? I'm just awfully curious now.  _________________ http://jordanreynolds.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cyclometh King's Row

Joined: 06 Aug 2010 Posts: 1051 Location: Olympia, WA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The original impetus behind this concept was I wanted to simplify my editing process for audiobook tracks. I do rolling recording and then edit the tracks, removing noises, flubs, page sounds, that sort of thing.
The process generally involves keeping a second or so of "room tone" (I record a few seconds with an open mic and no sound at the end of each track), cropping the offending pieces out and placing the room tone in- even at -65db the sound is better than silence; that's too jarring.
What I wanted was a way to avoid having to paste in the room tone but just be able to pipe it in. So I was looking at a compressor with a sidechain; feed it with the audio from the main track, when it dropped out (silence due to the audio being cut out), pipe in the room tone from another track. I use Cubase but any setup which supports sidechaining could in theory handle it.
What I found was that there really wasn't any combination of VSTs I could test that would get me a natural sound. The better way to do it turned out to be using Cubase's multiple lanes per track feature (used for loop recording) and just put the room tone on a subtrack of the vocal. Then cut out offending pieces, and size the gap, no pasting because it automatically picks up the next lane in the track when there's no audio on the top lane.
Anyway, that was my solution. It involves more copying and pasting than the original concept, but is simpler to do for all of that. _________________ Corey "Vox Man" Snow
http://voxman.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|