VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

What's your noise floor?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear !
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kristin Lennox
Flight Attendant


Joined: 30 Apr 2011
Posts: 858

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no idea what my noise floor is.

There. I said it.

cool
_________________
Always look on the bright side of life.

Dee doo. Dee doot doot doo dee doo.

my website
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dwpthe3rd
Contributore Level V


Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 199
Location: Where palm trees meet pines

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dbeers wrote:

Your mic gain is set where your usually record, with normal speech peaks hitting say -12db. Your noise floor in your booth is sitting at say, -65db room noise. But what if you start talking at a much louder, delivering peeks consistently at say -6db. You've not changed your pic amp level, and your room noise would still be at -65db. Thus using more head room, but not clipping.


This I would interpret as "dynamic range". which to my thinking has no effect on noise floor, although upon raising voice level you have the option to lower mic gain 6db with a commensurate noise floor 6db lower. Been following this with interest and eager to see where it's going.

Dave
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dwpthe3rd
Contributore Level V


Joined: 28 Feb 2010
Posts: 199
Location: Where palm trees meet pines

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kristin Lennox wrote:
I have no idea what my noise floor is.

There. I said it.

cool


Years ago with small kids I always thought my noise floor was when it was time to hollar "keep it down in there"! Laugh
_________________
If attacked by a mob of clowns go for the juggler.

dwpthe3rd
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ed Fisher
DC


Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 605
Location: East Coast, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Benjamin Stovall wrote:

Compression is something else entirely. Quieter levels are left untouched, while peaks are lowered to reduce dynamic range.

Limiting reduces the peaks, bringing up the overall volume.



Perhaps I'm mistaken, but I believe this is somewhat backwards.

Limiting reduces the peaks only. Quieter levels are not affected.

Compression reduces the dynamic range by BOTH pushing down the LOUD while at the same time pushing up the lower volume info.


Last edited by Ed Fisher on Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:58 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob Stevens
Contributore Level V


Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 151
Location: Orange County, California

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will quote Wiki....

Downward compression reduces loud sounds over a certain threshold while quiet sounds remain unaffected.

Upward compression increases the loudness of sounds below a threshold while leaving louder passages unchanged.

Both downward and upward compression reduce the dynamic range of an audio signal.

An expander performs the opposite function, increasing the dynamic range of the audio signal. Expanders are generally used to make quiet sounds even quieter by reducing the level of an audio signal that falls below a set threshold level.

Compression and limiting are not different in process but in degree and perceived effect. A limiter is a compressor with a high ratio and, generally, a fast attack time. Most engineers consider compression with ratio of 10:1 or more as limiting.
_________________
"Dialog is the painting on a canvas of silence"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kim Fuller
DC


Joined: 29 Jan 2011
Posts: 641
Location: Portlandish, Oregon

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kristin - so glad you said it. Because I was sure thinking it Laugh
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Ed Fisher
DC


Joined: 05 Sep 2012
Posts: 605
Location: East Coast, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree that "downward compression" and "limiting" are basically the same thing. I've just never thought of compression as being in only one direction. Every compressor I've ever owned did both at the same time. (which is why we called them "compressors" and not "limiters.") Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Benjamin Stovall
Been Here Awhile


Joined: 13 Dec 2011
Posts: 250
Location: Los Angeles, CA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

@Clutter Ash

I think it's a fair point to say that a limiter by default does not raise volume. To clarify, I should say that a limiter allows us to increase the loudness of the audio while maintaining a target peak level. The topic was about increasing volume, so I referenced it with that purpose in mind.

As far as compression goes, specifically downward compression as Bob was thoughtful enough to point out, the quiet levels are not affected. Of course, one could argue that "make-up gain" could be used, etc. There are a lot of misunderstandings about this. Just take a look at this thread over at Gearslutz and pop some corn: compressors do not make quiet sounds louder: true or false?

As an aside, The School of Audio Engineering has a great reference regarding limiters/compressors/expanders, etc. that can be found here:

http://www.sae.edu/reference_material/audio/pages/Compression.htm

Thanks,

Ben

EDIT: It's probably just a matter of time before someone checks me on the proper usage of volume vs. loudness. Wink
_________________
Ben Stovall Voiceover
http://www.benstovall.com

"When you're nearing the end of your rope, tie a knot. Keep on hanging. Keep on remembering, that there ain't nobody bad like you." -- The Electrifying Mojo


Last edited by Benjamin Stovall on Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:18 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
vkuehn
DC


Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 688
Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home

PostPosted: Tue Jul 30, 2013 8:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At times this conversation is frustrating, at times this conversation is amazingly amusing. Part of our challenge is that we cover a wide age span, and we became attached to the technical side of audio technology at different times in history.

I began working in radio BEFORE the transistor was in the marketplace. We had limiters and they were tube based devices. We had the schematics and you could read the instructions, take a V-O-M meter and see before your very eyes what was going on in the circuits and how the process worked. Just after I got started the first compressors (tube based) began showing up. In that era there was no terminology that I ever came across where people tried to talk about DOWNWARD compression as opposed to some other kind of compression.

Today's software based computerized versions of limiters and compressors and whatever else we call them are labeled as though they work just like the old discreet circuit hardware. Little graphic knobs are labeled dB (plus and minus), milliseconds, etc. They pretend to do what the old tube equipment did, but I must tell you that it took me 5 or 6 years to finally get where I could trick those electronic pretend knobs to do for me what the old mechanical knobs did.

For the life of me I cannot comprehend what the term UPWARD COMPRESSION means. In my feeble brain, compression is compression. It has no downward, no upward, no sideways. It's just compressed/mashed sound.

Some of you younger folks who have grown up with today's computerized audio processors get what you want out of them because you are not haunted by this "ghost of recording sessions past" and the language of the past.

Here is an amusing related situation. I'm also a bit of a photography nut. I used to have a home darkroom with trays and developer chemicals and an enlarger. We dealt in exposure, contrast, hard and soft paper, etc. When I go into photo editing discussion boards, you sometimes find this same conversation. Adobe Photoshop gives you controls to control all kinds of attributes of a photographic image and they are labeled with names to indicate that changing a control in Photoshop will do the same thing you used to do in the dark room. But some "deep thinkers" who say they have a lot of technical skills make a lot of arguments that when when adjust the CONTRAST in Photoshop, you are really getting some other change that creates a pseudo-contrast change! (Do I, Should I... care if it is pseudo or real? Only if I don't get the result I wanted and I have to learn to lie to my software to get what I really want.)

Welcome to technology of the 21st century. All of this rambling to say that we all need to have some patience with this thread. We are all using words that sound like we all speak the same language, but in some technical areas, we aren't. Be patient as we work out our language kinks.

Now, if you will excuse me, I need to go "fluff up" my hard drive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
georgethetech
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1878
Location: Topanga, CA

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 1:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I only use peak values when measuring noise floor/dynamic range.
Compressors/limiters only raise perceived volume when the RMS increases after makeup gain is applied. However, in the case of many digital limiters, the makeup gain is built-in, such as in "Maximizers", with the ability to set the maximum level, as in normalization.
Compressors ALWAYS raise noise floor if you use make-up gain.

That said, I've heard two files that sound drastically different in terms of noise, but read nearly the same on the meters. Obviously, not all noise is created equal.

If it sounds good, then it is good.
_________________
If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Philip Banks
Je Ne Sais Quoi


Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 11076
Location: Portgordon, Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the top 7ft 2in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rob Ellis
M&M


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 2385
Location: Detroit

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

okay but what is that in dbs? cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Rob Ellis
M&M


Joined: 01 Aug 2006
Posts: 2385
Location: Detroit

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I have no idea what my noise floor is.


Kristin you will NEVER become a gear geek with that kind of attitude
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Philip Banks
Je Ne Sais Quoi


Joined: 20 Jun 2005
Posts: 11076
Location: Portgordon, Scotland

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 5:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Would 7ft 2in from the top equate to 11?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
ballenberg
Lucky 700


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 793
Location: United States

PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

George said:

Quote:
That said, I've heard two files that sound drastically different in terms of noise, but read nearly the same on the meters. Obviously, not all noise is created equal.

If it sounds good, then it is good.


Wait--you mean George, who is The Man on all things technical, agrees with my simple theory noted earlier in this thread ?

I love it Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear ! All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 2 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group