View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
D Voice Been Here Awhile

Joined: 26 Jun 2010 Posts: 232
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2014 11:48 pm Post subject: sssibilance (lower range) |
|
|
My sibilance seems to be much lower than normal:
in the 3500-4000 Hz range(!).
Many plugins and de-essers don't even go down that far. That also suxss because it seems that's just about where a lot of engineers (or EQ presets), like to give things a boost to make the voice stand out.
When I record dry it doesn't seem to be much of an issue. But when compression or EQing are added, they can really pop up. Maybe I am too sensitive about it, but it certainly bugs me.
Any body else with this problem or suggestions?
I have played a bit with mic placement, etc. (smiling on the ss's seems to raise the frequency range slightly, but not a lot). Any EQing tips or (preferably free/cheap) plugins, etc. to address this, without sucking the life out of the performance? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vkuehn DC

Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 688 Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe this could turn out to be a very interesting thread. I am trying to figure out the pattern in which some of my sibilants deliver a nasty bit of static.
If you zoom in on most audio, you see the classic waveforms that look life the Rockettes from Radio City Music Hall dancing in lockstep. Sibilants when zoomed in on look like a centipede doing the dance line.
My noisy, nasty sibilants look like... like... well years ago when I had the bug to be a fisherman, I had a casting reel and if you didn't handle it right all the fishing line ended up in a nasty backlash!!! On screen, these nasty, static filled sibilants look like my old Shakespeare reel after a backlash hit by a bolt of lightning. I'm still searching for a software fix for those. I normally end up having to re-record. Maybe we can find answers to each others problems here. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
One of the things both of you have forgotten is: What mics are you using?
Are they Chinese mics or are the mods or are they .... what?
INFORMATION please.
FF _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vkuehn DC

Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 688 Location: Vernon now calls Wisconsin home
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frank F wrote: |
One of the things both of you have forgotten is: What mics are you using?
|
No, I haven't forgotten to consider the mid... just been busy taking care of other issues. In my case, it could be a voice issue. I've been narrating some books where I allow my "Southwestern story-teller" accent into the room. Maybe my vocal chords are the problem.
I sensed my analog-to-digital converter was getting tired. Maybe it was part of the problem. Replaced it but the problem remains.
I have begun marking scripts so I can come up with two or three minutes of phrases that are made up of copy that results in these noisy sibilants. Then maybe I can wander off to someone else's studio or to a retailer that has a recording studio where I could test my voice against half a dozen different mics as a reference and comparison.
Now... to your question about the mic: My original mic was an OLD Electrovoice DO-54 dynamic mic that Columbus and I brought across the ocean blue a couple of centuries ago. Then I ventured into an AT-2020 which is still in storage here somewhere and from that I graduated to an AT-4033. Then as I shared conversation on another site about getting my "room tone noise level" down to an acceptable level, someone put a mic in my hands designed to solve the noise issue: a mic I had been avoiding. It wasn't my style. It wasn't the mic for MY voice. Surely. But he insisted I give it a try: An EV RE-20. I've been using it about a year now. It improved the noise level by about 9 dB. (My experiments indicate that is the result of using it up close. Going from working the mic 8 to 12 inches away to working the mic 2 to 3 inches away can result in a 9 dB increase in the voice level while the noise remains the same.
So. No new LONG book projects for right now. Just finishing up construction on something to reduce studio noise that comes in from the outside. And now I am using a small totally solid-state tablet device to make my recordings so there is no processor fan, power-supply fan or grumbling hard drive to make noise.
So the time has come now to focus on: Why is there a verbal nervous break-down on certain sibilants? I think I have the ambient noise problem down to where I can probably use any mic I want.... if I find one that is more generous to my grimy old Southwestern vocal chords.
P.S. I recently brought the AT-4033 out of storage and set up a mounting so that both mics can be active. I now am making my recordings with two mics, two channels. As I come across ugly sounding syllables, I can look at the expanded waveform on screen and see if both mics are delivering the same offensive sound. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Fisher DC

Joined: 05 Sep 2012 Posts: 605 Location: East Coast, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:04 pm Post subject: Re: sssibilance (lower range) |
|
|
D Voice wrote: | My sibilance seems to be much lower than normal:
in the 3500-4000 Hz range(!). |
Perhaps it would be useful if you gave us an audio sample? _________________ "I reserve the right to be completely wrong." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Campbell DC

Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 621
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We all have sibilants in our voices, some more than others. It's a naturally occurring thing. Unless its breaking up your mic real bad, I wouldn't worry about it.
If your audio is heard in broadcast, the station's processing will handle most of it. If it's on the web, it'll sound ok on computer speakers. _________________ www.asapaudio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisvoco Club 300

Joined: 14 Mar 2014 Posts: 380 Location: Local
|
Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2014 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keyed ducking / sidechain compression will give you additional control. I've found that multiband compressors and de-esser plugins that do this fairly automatically don't give me quite the result I want - the de-esser plugin that comes with Reaper, for instance, never quite sounds just right to me, even when I carefully dial in my frequency range and flip its switch to monitor and verify what's triggering it: it alwayssch schounds to me like I'm schquished too much.
Had been thinking about how to manually do this to see if it works any better - and behold, the new issue of Electronic Musician arrived yesterday, with an article *precisely about this very thing*. It's worth a read. Looking online, though, darned if I can find a transcript of it.
So, try:
Sidechain discussion on sound.stackexchange.com with good explanation - the first answer on the page, with the diagram, gives a good idea of how it works, though the discussion is actually about dance music (ignore that part )
Also,
Frequency Selective Dynamics - specifically, the part in the "Links" section, at the bottom of the page, about "DIY Multi-band Processing"
Hope that helps a little. I'm going to devote some time to testing whether a dedicated plugin or a customized fx chain does the trick better - I really don't know which I think will be the winner. _________________ Finally, Ford stops starting to say things and starts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found a carefully placed EQ notch or two does the trick in all but the worst cases... The Adobe Audition CS6 de-esser does nicely, which is just a portion of the multiband compressor anyhow. _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
chrisvoco Club 300

Joined: 14 Mar 2014 Posts: 380 Location: Local
|
Posted: Thu May 01, 2014 5:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think I may be at least close to the worst case. It wasn't a problem for me until dentures. The frequencies are strange. Experimenting, I find I need to span quite a lot to be effective, and that's when it crosses the threshold of unusable. Just being able to notch would be welcome - but in my case you'd need several and it would be more like a comb.
Physical positioning and learning how to make the sound differently reduce the problem and, when I'm alert, lubricated and warmed up, pretty much eliminate it altogether.
But if we're soon going to be at the singularity, I feel entitled to automate the process.  _________________ Finally, Ford stops starting to say things and starts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|