View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tackerman The Gates of Troy

Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 1741 Location: in the ether
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:51 pm Post subject: Studio Test |
|
|
Here's the first dry run of the new setup. I filtered out the noise (baby monitor) on both tracks. Rode NTK to Mackie 1220 firewire to PC.
#1 Nothing added or applied.
http://www.voicetom.com/mp3/Studio_test_1.mp3
#2 I threw on the Perkins EQ just for the heck of it. It seems to add a little on the low end but I'm having a hard time telling.
http://www.voicetom.com/mp3/Studio_test_2.mp3
Please tell me what I'm screwing up if anything.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
allensco Flight Attendant

Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 823 Location: Alabama, USA
|
Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tom,
Both tracks are very clear and clean to my ears. The second one with the Perkins EQ is not much different than the track without it. It does make a very small difference though.
Sounds like you've got a great set up going there! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jasbart Been Here Awhile

Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 293 Location: Gilbertsville, KY
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:28 am Post subject: Re: Studio Test |
|
|
VoiceTom wrote: | Here's the first dry run of the new setup. I filtered out the noise (baby monitor) on both tracks. Rode NTK to Mackie 1220 firewire to PC.
#1 Nothing added or applied.
http://www.voicetom.com/mp3/Studio_test_1.mp3
#2 I threw on the Perkins EQ just for the heck of it. It seems to add a little on the low end but I'm having a hard time telling.
http://www.voicetom.com/mp3/Studio_test_2.mp3
Please tell me what I'm screwing up if anything.  |
It sounds very good Tom, at least it does on my old computer speakers. At first I thought sample 2 brought down some extreme highs, but then re-read your post that stated you brought up some lows.
Good to hear you're up and running,
Jim _________________ Jim Barton
Barton Voice & Sound
www.bartonvoice.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bailey 4 Large

Joined: 04 Jun 2005 Posts: 4336 Location: Lake San Marcos... north of Connie, northwest of the Best.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Both were clear to my ears... but #2 was warmer and smoother. _________________ "Bailey"
a.k.a. Jim Sutton
Retired... Every day is Saturday, except Sunday.
VO-BB Member #00044 .gif" alt="W00T" border="0" />
AOVA Graduate 02/2004 ;
"Be a Voice, not an Echo." |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tackerman The Gates of Troy

Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 1741 Location: in the ether
|
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2006 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks folks!
Working with the Mackie has been less than easy and I've still got some issues with it...
I've already started thinking about upgrading.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dan4VO Contributor

Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 42 Location: Asheville, NC
|
Posted: Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: FYI |
|
|
If you are recording to your computer via the Mackie Onyx firewire card...the perkins EQ is not in the signal path unless you've had your Onyx modified. The signal that gets recorded to the computer via Mackie Onyx firewire comes directly from the Mic Pre. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tackerman The Gates of Troy

Joined: 14 Jun 2006 Posts: 1741 Location: in the ether
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:03 am Post subject: Re: FYI |
|
|
danno812 wrote: | If you are recording to your computer via the Mackie Onyx firewire card...the perkins EQ is not in the signal path unless you've had your Onyx modified. The signal that gets recorded to the computer via Mackie Onyx firewire comes directly from the Mic Pre. |
Well that might be why I didn't notice much of a difference.  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|