|
VO-BB - 19 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mcm Smart Kitteh
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 2600 Location: w. MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:43 pm Post subject: Equipment Crossroad |
|
|
So, I've been recording VO for 10 months with my Rode NT1A and Behringer Eurorack B802 cutiepie mixer and am growing dissatisfied with the quality of the recordings. I need warmth. Something. I don't like anything I'm doing as much as I like my demo, which was recorded on about $7000 worth of equipment so I'm not going there and probably don't have to. But I don't know where to start. Microphone or pre-amp/processor. If the latter, I'm thinking about the by-pass-the-sound-card route. Like the Mackie Spike. Could I do better? I know there have been discussions of mixers ad nauseum here, and some mention of the Spike. But in looking through the discussions I don't see anything that quite addresses the problem I'm having, primarily because I don't really know what the problem is that I'm having!! General dissatisfaction and je ne sais quois. My recordings seem a little muddy somehow.
Sigh.
Any thoughts? Sorry to be so vague. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Philip Banks Je Ne Sais Quoi
Joined: 20 Jun 2005 Posts: 11060 Location: Portgordon, Scotland
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First you have to say how much you will spend as opposed to how much you won't. A recording engineer with 30 years experience told me to buy THE mic, spend as much as possible + a little extra, then with what's left buy the rest. The built in pre-amps on the Behringer are fine and will not colour the sound of a good mic. Having not heard the sound you don't like it's difficult to suggest how to get the sound you will like.
As a general rule of thumb. If your sound isn't clean and clear, good enough to broadcast with pre-amp just powering the mic, no compression and neutral EQ you need to do something. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brianforrester Backstage Pass
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 492 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Mary,
My first thought is that the problem with the muddiness of your vocals is the mic... the second mic I purchased was actually the NT1A... I'm a big fan of Rode mics, but I really found that particular mic just muddied up my vocals. I then moved onto the NT1000 and have been very happy! However having recently recorded in various studios with a TLM 103, Rode NTK and U87!!!!! I've decided that it won't be long before I'll be upgrading, either the TLM 103 or NTK will probably be the route I'll go(unless of course I can find a U87 for the same price... yeah right!!).
My experience with Behringer mixers (I had a UB802 for about a week before I sold it on E-bay) has been less than impressive. I've since started running my mic right into the mbox and overall have been much more satisfied with the sound. I'm currently considering purchasing a stand-alone mic pre-amp (maybe a presonus Eureka).
My suggestion would be along the lines of what Phil has said, start at the mic and work your way backwards. If you can spend about $350 on a mic, I think you'll be really happy as a starting point (if you can afford more, then make the investment in a better mic). If you're running purely into a sound card, you'll definately need a solid pre-amp (sound card pre's usually suck!), but you can probably get away with a price range of about $100 - $150 (all the prices I'm talking about are based on my favorite marketplace ... EBAY!). I personally don't see too much neccesisty in running with a mixer, therefore a good mic, running through a good pre-amp, into a good sound card or external device like the M-Audio stuff or Mbox (you don't necessarily need a pre-amp if you use the mbox, the pre's are pretty good). If you want to stay with using Audition (I think that's what you have said you are using), then go with the M-Audio external option and throw a pre-amp into the chain. All said, I'd guess you could be into a pretty good signal chain for a bit over $500 - $600.
As with everything, simply my opinion based on some costly mistakes and many hours of reading reviews and opinions.
Good Luck _________________ Brian Forrester Voice Overs
www.brianforrester.com
brian@brianforrester.com
778.668.5715 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Micazon Guest
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:33 pm Post subject: warmth in sound |
|
|
(In a world) without tape recorders, there are basically two ways to record: 1) into a cd burner directly or, 2) into a computer/other electronic device. With either you can still use the computer to store/transmit the files you record. So, first things first. Do you want to have to rely on a computer to record and store or use a cd recorder to record/burn and then transfer the files to a computer anyway? It probably depends on how computer savvy you are or want to be.
If you're using just the recorder then additional equipment like mic amps, conpressors, and equalization(eq's) will be needed to give you the sound and the warmth for which you are looking. This could be many dollars for the investment. Sometimes thousands of them.
If you're using the computer then there are software programs that will give the warmth, like Audition, which is relatively inexpensive compared to others that might cost over $1,000. This is generally cheaper than all the other equipment, however purists will tell you that it will sound like a digital recording when you're done. Don't pay attention to them. Make it sound clean, add a little eq and compression only and let yoru client tweak it if they want to do so. When it plays at the radio/tv station, they will compress it more anyway. This will automatically give it a warmer and usually bigger sound.
The other members of the board are right in saying that starting with the best mic you can afford. In some cases, depending on the mic, your voice, the acoustics of the room you record in combination with the software or other equipment, you'll have what you are looking for anyway. Great room acoustics are key for this. If you have a good pro audion store close by you, start a relationship with one or more salespeople and tell them want you're doing. See if you can take a mic or two home and try them both to see which one is best for you. Ask them about a return policy and how liberal it is and if they have a professional discount that they can give you. Hint: they do.
So, how much do you want to spend?, Are you wanting to use just a computer/input device like a sound card, or do you want to invest in other equipment, too, if you haven't already done so.
In a land where there is not one answer for all, you have to pick for yourself and once you answer these questions for you, the direction to go to will be simpler.
No charge.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcm Smart Kitteh
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 2600 Location: w. MA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Have already got the good computer, okay sound card (SB Audigy 2), software (Audition), a decent but not great mic and a sturdy little trooper of a mixer to power the mic. What I'm trying to decide is 1) whether to bypass the sound card and upgrade to something like a Mackie A-D processor and/or b) upgrade to a mic that is better suited to my voice which is on the light and airy side in its default setting.
I'm hearing mic. Trouble is, I know lots of guys and their mics (hey, don't EVEN go there) but don't know many women VO and none with a voice like mine so I don't have many ideas about what mic would be good for me. One suggestion was AT 4033. Another was Gefell (is that a Neumann make?) which is trop cher pour moi right now - no mic stores nearby, more's the pity. I will be starting work on a documentary next week, and would really like to improve my sound in time for that project, since the voice will be so "out there". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
lisaloo Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 4:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amen to the comments about spending the $ on the mic. It's everything.
Garbage in, garbage out and all that.
My everyday mic is a Neumann TLM-103 -- not super-cheap, but worth every penny and hardly the most expensive on the market. I don't have a ton of experience with owning other brands, but I find that condenser mics (in general) treat me better than others and that Neumann's are this girl's best friend. Especially if you have a mid-to-lower register voice -- this mic will likely serve you well, too. If you're looking for warmth, go this route.
In any case, spend your money on the mic first and it will solve a lot of other problems for you.
I also just bought a mic processor (Behringer MD2200 or whatever the hell it's called) and I have to say that I can't tell if it's made a lick of difference. Then again, I really don't know what the heck to do with it, so there's that.
But it didn't hurt. And it only set me back a small amount on eBay.
Hope this helps,
Loo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Charlie Channel Club 300
Joined: 08 Feb 2005 Posts: 356 Location: East Palo Alto, CA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
In the realm of "it blew my mind" and Boys and their Toys, last November I was exploring and met another VO using AudioTX. So, we decided to test the IP feature of the product.
The artist is well known and works alot. And, when we connected, I was totally blown away by the quality of his mic. My monitors speakers are Studiophile BX5's and my headphones are Sony MCR-V900.
When I asked him what mic he was using, he said it was actually a $120 inexpensive mic. But, he was also running a microphone modeler that came with his "older" Roland DAW. He was modeling a U-87. He said his clients didn't know the difference and he'd not had any complaints over the years.
So, that sent me off to find something. I ended up scoring a an Antares microphone modeler on Ebay for $200 or so. So, now I can make a Shure SM-58 sound sort of like a Neuman U-87, U-47, TM-103 or whatever.
B U T !!!! The fact is, the equipment hasn't scored me one job. And, I think the fact that you're getting work means your talent and skill is what's making the difference.
The vet's with engineering skill can probably speak more to this observation I've made: The sonic quality may be a function of the microphone, but the context of the audio content will likely effect what is produced. And, that is often in the domain of the engineer and producer.
When I listen to commercials, I find the vo audio content affected by the setting of the script. Street tone may be in the background and the voiced audio may be tweeked to give it that kind of sound. "Office tone?" Conversational, matter-of-fact chatting between two co-workers is mic'd to make it sound like a mic in an office; or maybe it's EQ'd and processed to sound like that. The clearest example is EQ'ing a read made with a Neuman through a filter so it sounds like a real telephone conversation, at least on one side.
Along the way, I found out that in music production, there's a process called "mastering" that makes a big difference in how what's recorded sounds to those who listen. So, it's important to remember that what you're hearing when you listen to yourself has not been mastered.
Again, those vet's with engineering acumen can speak about how mastering affects voice content. On that subject, as best I can tell, the signal is tweeked to make it sound good on as many speakers as the audience may be listening on. Boom box. Auto stereo. HDTV sound surround. Table radio.
I can "see" how a book on tape recording would be mastered to be intelligible when listened to in a car. In that environment, road noise may mask perceived difficiencies.
There are a lot of variables in the chain, so the advice to invest in a good mic and a good pre is on the mark.
You may want to converse with some engineers on which mic's they like to use with female voices. I worked with a producer/engineer who had a mic closet and a good handle on which mic's worked better for male versus female voices. And, to really put things in perspective, I read where one working talent wrote that his best mic ever, as far as he was concerned, was some cheap mic (maybe cost around $35) that's no longer in production. ':shock:'
cc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kgenus Seriously Devoted
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 889 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don't be fooled by the room you recorded your demo in. There is an equation that's a known factor for audio, which causes recorded audio to sound better (4W x 5L x 8H). It's the reason so many booths have 4x6 external dimensions. A square room introduces modes which can become a nightmare to work with once you get behind the mixer.
Also, the preamp is just as important as the mic, as is the conversion. The difference is that preamps do not cost as much as mics. I prefer tube preamps because dynamic mics still sound great when they're plugged in, but everyone has an opinion there. Of the solid state preamps, John Hardy Preamps are relatively inexpensive and they're one of the few preamps you never see on chopping block. Plan a few trips to Boston's Mercenary Audio. Those people are the real deal, not the GC brand....
Kevin _________________ Genus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kitstern Been Here Awhile
Joined: 06 Feb 2005 Posts: 218 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would second Kevin on the preamp. The Earthworks 101 mic pre I bought last year (thank you Kevin) has made a big difference in the clarity of the Gefell mic I have. But the mic is the main thing, make sure it suits your voice without anything else added to the chain. Then the other equipment added is the icing on the cake. _________________ Enjoy life, this is not a rehearsal.
http://www.kitziestern.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike Nasty Brit
Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 476 Location: Tomorrowland
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject: Re: Equipment Crossroad |
|
|
mcm wrote: | I don't know where to start. Microphone or pre-amp/processor. |
Ideally, both.
The price/quality ratio for mics has changed drastically in recent years. The primary criterea for choosing a mic for VO is exclusively "how does that mic sound on my voice" Price is no longer a real guide. A U87 will sound 'good' on a larger range of sources, but a cheaper Chinese mic may well sound 'great' on your particular voice. This makes choosing the best mic almost impossible without having access to a wide range.
After that it's a matter of buying the best, cleanest pre-amp you can. This can easily cost more than the mic itself! I used to run my mics through the pre-amps on my old Yamaha 02r board, but the differences in the mics really became apparent when I switched over to using a quality pre-amp (Earthworks LAB102 - The two channel version of Kitsterns amp). You might find that your Rode will give you what you if run it through a decent pre-amp.....but then maybe not. That's the problem. Too many variables.
But then, if your clients are happy with the sound they are getting then do you really need to change?
Maiku. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
donrandall Guest
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I'm currently considering purchasing a stand-alone mic pre-amp (maybe a presonus Eureka). |
Brian, that is a pretty good piece of equipment. It has a good pre (with some interesting adustments), a decent eq and a usable compressor. I have one and even though I am quite pleased with it, I still wish I could have tried out the Symetrix. I'm thinking it would be nice to have the de-esser (which the Presonus does not have) and maybe even the downward expander (which the Presonus does not have).
Then again, it's also possible that I may not have liked the Symetrix at all if I had a chance to play around with it for a while. It seems that, no matter what I buy, I always have that "buyer's remorse" thing and wonder if I should have gone with something else! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brianforrester Backstage Pass
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 492 Location: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hey Don,
I actually just completed the sale on the Presonus Eureka. I found an awesome deal for a brand new unit complete with the AD192 card for $449 plus shipping of about $30. I'm not to sure about whether or not I'll use the AD192, I may just sell it, but I'd welcome your input if you have it with your unit.
I weighed the pros and cons of going with the Symetrix, but from some of the reviews I read, and the fact that they are used quite heavily in broadcast and live performance applications, kinda turned me off. I'm looking for a studio grade unit, not a live/broadcast grade unit... who knows, I could be making a huge mistake, but it wouldn't be the first one related to hardware. I know that a bunch of y'all are using the Symetrix and are very happy with it, so I may be joining your ranks if I'm unhappy with the Eureka.
Anyway, I've kinda gone a spending spree! I just bought a TLM103, the Presonus, and some other misc studio items so I can't wait to get them all in my hot little hands and start to play.
Needless to say, I'll in all likelihood be selling a Rode NT1000 and NTK in the not to distant future (unless for some unforseen reason I don't like the TLM103... yeah right!), so if anybody is in the market please let me know.
Anyway everbody.... it's great to be back in the posts!!! Thanks for all of your efforts DB, I along with the others truly do appreicate all of your work!!!! This board has become a part of my daily routine! THANK YOU!!!
Cheers, _________________ Brian Forrester Voice Overs
www.brianforrester.com
brian@brianforrester.com
778.668.5715 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kitstern Been Here Awhile
Joined: 06 Feb 2005 Posts: 218 Location: Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I second that. I don't always have time to post, but I always read the board and when we were down I really missed it.
DB, thanks for all your hard work in getting us back up again. Don't know what we'd do without you! _________________ Enjoy life, this is not a rehearsal.
http://www.kitziestern.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mcm Smart Kitteh
Joined: 10 Dec 2004 Posts: 2600 Location: w. MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Needless to say, I'll in all likelihood be selling a Rode NT1000 and NTK in the not to distant future (unless for some unforseen reason I don't like the TLM103... yeah right!), so if anybody is in the market please let me know. |
For the record, I will not be buying your Rode mics Brian. If you get an email from me purporting to express interest, it's SPAM and you should report it to your system administrator.
Enjoy yr new mic.
Sigh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kgenus Seriously Devoted
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 889 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Wed Sep 28, 2005 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
brianforrester wrote: | (unless for some unforseen reason I don't like the TLM103... yeah right!) |
... you'll get a good eq and keep on keepin' on? _________________ Genus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|