VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Teen voice of 'Dora The Explorer" sues Nickelodeon

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tom Test
DC


Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 629
Location: Chicago, IL

PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 5:14 pm    Post subject: Teen voice of 'Dora The Explorer" sues Nickelodeon Reply with quote

This caught my eye!

"She and her family were pressured into signing an unfair contract quickly, without consulting a lawyer, and then were subject to "three and a half years of exploitation and lies," according to her suit. Filed Wednesday, it seeks unspecified damages.

While she made $5,115 per episode, she wasn't paid or was grossly undercompensated for at least 160 extra hours of recording work, and at least 400 hours of promotions, marketing and interviews, her lawsuit said. While traveling the country to talk up the show, she got only $40 a day, it said.

She also wasn't paid her due share of profits from Dora merchandise and her residuals, or rerun fees, for at least 325 airings of her "Dora" episodes – even as Nickelodeon executives told her she'd played a big role in the show's success, according to her lawsuit. One said there had never been "a more high-profile face to a voice," the lawsuit said."

I can't judge if she has a legitimate lawsuit or not, but it looks like she was treated poorly from this article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20101007/us-dora-the-explorer-lawsuit/
_________________
Best regards,
Tom Test
"The Voice You Trust"
www.tomtest.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Bruce
Boardmeister


Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 7977
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dumb parents, dumb Nikelodeon, happy lawyers.


B
_________________
VO-BB Member #31 Enlisted June, 2005

I'm not a Zoo, but over the years I've played one on radio/TV. .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
JBarrett
M&M


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 2043
Location: Las Vegas, NV

PostPosted: Thu Oct 07, 2010 8:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dora explores the judicial system. Pity.
_________________
Justin S. Barrett
http://www.justinsbarrett.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Moe Egan
4 Large


Joined: 11 Sep 2006
Posts: 4339
Location: Live Free or Die

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And the take away from this, so we're all on the same page and able to bring our careers to the next level -

Caveat Vox
_________________
Moe Egan
i want to be the voice in your head.
~~~~~
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:03 am    Post subject: Re: Teen voice of 'Dora The Explorer" sues Nickelodeon Reply with quote

Tom Test wrote:

I can't judge if she has a legitimate lawsuit or not, but it looks like she was treated poorly from this article

It sounds like there were at least 3 adults in that room looking out for her well being; her parent and the agent. And they failed. Nick did nothing wrong, they simply offered the lowest fee possible, and mom, dad and the agent saw dollars and accepted the offer under duress.

1) Do not sign anything under duress, and if you do be prepared to accept the consequences.

2) If you go to a network to sign a contract- bring your lawyer and your agent. Have your lawyer there anyway. (And taking a lesson form the McCourts'/Dodgers case, if it is a multi page document, initial each page, or better yet each paragraph. (Your millage may vary, see your lawyer))

3) If someone says you have to agree and sign a document without being abel read and understand it without counsel. Walk away! And tell them you're going to take it to your lawyer anyway.


The shameful part, if true, is that if Nick welched on the pittance of the agreement, then Nick should have the screws put to them.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Schoen
Backstage Pass


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 443
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 11:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a bad lawsuit on so many levels.
1. No one could have known how successful "Dora the Explorer" would be. Both parties signed the deal with eyes wide open.
2. Now that the deal is done, 14 year old Caitlin could try to add on to her career based on her initial success -- but instead chose to litigate.
3. You cannot believe the claims in a lawsuit -- lawyers go wide at the start.

I expect Nick will settle -- so she'll get a few more bucks -- but the process is bound to be painful...and could hamper her future efforts so she will have peaked at the age of 14.

In terms of "promises" made -- if it's not in the contract it will be hard to prove.
Do you really think they were "under duress" when they signed? I suspect they were thrilled to do it.
_________________
http://MichaelSchoen.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
craigcrumpton
Been Here Awhile


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael Schoen wrote:
1. No one could have known how successful "Dora the Explorer" would be. Both parties signed the deal with eyes wide open.
I realize I'm nitpicking here, but Caitlin Sanchez wasn't cast as Dora until 2007, I believe. Katherine Herles was the original voice -- voices.com did an interview with her last year:

http://blogs.voices.com/voxdaily/2009/03/kathleen_herles_original_voice.html

The show was already hugely popular worldwide when Sanchez was in negotiations to take over the role, so I would say the blame lies on Sanchez' parents and the agent who agreed on the terms of the contract.

Unfortunately, Sanchez probably won't get anything out of the lawsuit, except maybe a settlement at best that's a pittance of what the role was worth if it had been negotiated under a standard union contract.
_________________
Publisher: Voice Actors in the News
Host: Viva VO Atlanta! (on VU and Facebook for VO peeps in the Southeast US)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Michael Schoen
Backstage Pass


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 443
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Craig,
I don't think you are nitpicking -- I wasn't aware it was the second Dora.
Nonetheless -- I am sure they were falling all over themselves to get the gig -- and now that it's over, they are raising objection.
Totally agree parents should have had someone smart look at the deal -- but I am guessing if they asked for too much, there would have been a different Dora... and it was and will always be a buyer's market.
_________________
http://MichaelSchoen.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
craigcrumpton
Been Here Awhile


Joined: 17 Mar 2008
Posts: 240
Location: Atlanta, GA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, Sanchez was essentially being hired non-union for a soundalike gig, and if the agent/parents had held out for residuals and such, Nick would have kept looking until they found someone to work for *their* price.

And I would have personally been overjoyed with $5100 per episode for a soundalike, although the role was worth so much more than that. But I still would have had lawyers scrutinize the contract terms and maybe even gotten a different agent to negotiate if need be.
_________________
Publisher: Voice Actors in the News
Host: Viva VO Atlanta! (on VU and Facebook for VO peeps in the Southeast US)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Michael Schoen
Backstage Pass


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 443
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Fri Oct 08, 2010 12:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We agree Craig.
Sometimes you think you are worth X and you agent tells you the market will only bear Y. The agent is usually right.
_________________
http://MichaelSchoen.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bruce
Boardmeister


Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 7977
Location: Portland, OR

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I read this article, an agent was not brought in to the process. The better/smarter production companies insist on talent getting an agent just to avoid problems like this. Even though it costs them more initially, it saves their bacon later as in this brouhaha.

A handshake and a smile have a higher potential for failure the higher the dollar figures get in any business.

Speaking of "child" stars succeeding through agents, Angus T. Jones, who plays the "half" on the show Two and a Half Men, just cut a deal for $300,000 an episode (x26) for two years, plus a half million dollar signing bonus. He's now 17.


B
_________________
VO-BB Member #31 Enlisted June, 2005

I'm not a Zoo, but over the years I've played one on radio/TV. .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Michael Schoen
Backstage Pass


Joined: 14 May 2008
Posts: 443
Location: New York City

PostPosted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Plus Angus will be getting checks for years as the show plays 5 days a week in syndication.
It's always good to be a cast member in a long running show.
Some years ago we were looking at houses in L-A -- and came across a nice one in the Hollywood Hills, not far from where we actually ended up. Views included the Hollywood sign. Typical multi level decks and a pool.
But the layout was a little strange and the rooms too small for our outsized furniture.
But something was strange. Pictures of Tony Danza and Judy Lite were everywhere along with other cast members from "Who's the Boss."
Turns out the guy selling the home was one of the original creators of that successful sitcom and he was moving back home to Massachusetts -- and out of Hollywood he had made so much money.
_________________
http://MichaelSchoen.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Mike Sommer
A Hundred Dozen


Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 1222
Location: Boss Angeles

PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:31 pm    Post subject: Dora the Extorter!!! Reply with quote

Now she's breaking out the baseball bat/

http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/10/12/2010-10-12_dora_the_explorer_voice_caitlin_sanchez_sets_deadline_for_nickelodeon_to_reach_c.html


It kind of serves Viacom and other Studio executives right for paying unconscionably huge loads of cash and perks to hire Big Name Celebrities to appear in their feature animated cartoon, instead of using real Professional Voice Talent for their Star Character roles.

But I still think she a bit of a whiner: Her contract is not usual for a regular TV animation Day Player. And those promotional junkets are catered from start to finish. It's like an all expense paid, working vacation, with fine rooms, food and handlers.
_________________
The Blog:
http://voiceoveraudio.blogspot.com/

Acoustics are counter-intuitive. If one thing is certain about acoustics, it is that if anything seems obvious it is probably wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Chat All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group