 |
VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Established November 10, 2004
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Gregory Best The Gates of Troy

Joined: 04 Aug 2005 Posts: 1853 Location: San Diego area (east of Connie and south and east of Bailey)
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frank, nice to see you back contributing your vast knowledge of the biz. _________________ Gregory Best
greg@gregorybest.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marik
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 9 Location: SLC
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frank F wrote: |
it is the microphone cannot handle the transient levels and sudden SPL's of the human voice speaking. The "ribbon" microphone was and IS designed for sustained, smooth, moderated sounds by virtue of it (ribbon) motor.
|
Hi Frank,
Do you have any data to support that?
In general, ribbons have excellent transient response (at least on the par with condenser mics, if not better) and can easily handle SPLs the condensers could only dream of.
And no, even vintage ribbons were not designed for “sustained, smooth, moderated sounds”. In fact, for example BK5 could easily take the SPL of a gun shot sound in close proximity. Show me a condenser capable of that.
I know nothing what condensers (true pressure types are a special case) can do and ribbons cannot… with lower distortions, and much more natural sonics. I cannot say the same the other way around.
Best, M _________________ Mark Fouxman
Samar Audio & Microphone Design
www.samaraudiodesign.com
The Art of Ribbon Microphones--design, repairs, re-ribboning, modifications, motor machining and fabrication, transformers, and more... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mark!!!!!!!
Folks this is the "Mark" I had written about earlier from Samar Audio Design. Welcome Mark.
When it comes to microphones this man is the best and I respect his knowledge above others.
After a long discussion about ribbon motors and condenser capsules Mark and I know more about about what drives each others thoughts. We both agree that a microphone should fit the need of the person and the activity required.
In my case ribbons mics have not been my "go-to" tool, although Mark is attempting convince me this type of microphone can be designed to fulfill my needs with exceptional results.
Again, thank you for coming on board Mark your knowledge will benefit all here. And, Welcome to our part of the universe.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Welcome Mark - it's great to have you here.
Would love to hear more thoughts on ribbon mics for v/o. As I said previously, I'd very much like to be sold on a ribbon, but I've never found one that gives me the punch of an LDC. They always feel a bit "slow" to me.... _________________ Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marik
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 9 Location: SLC
|
Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Frank and Colin for warm welcome!
The terms like "slow", "punch" are rather matter of semantics and in fact, can be just reflection of some other things and in this case, I think it is fig.8 pattern together with a lack of upper octaves response, many ribbons exhibit.
Definitely, some people look for more "focused" sound of the cardioid pattern, the fig.8 ribbon just cannot give. That is, if we follow 1:0.7 pattern rule, the main difficulty of using the fig8 would be a huge proximity. You cannot really get too close to the mic without things becoming way boomy. In other words, the ribbons should be EQed. This can be done whether in the construction, or with the outboard equalizer.
Some will say "ney" to any EQing advocating the "purity" of the signal path. It is however, does not matter where you insert the EQ--outboard, or build it into the mic--either way it is still an EQ. Moreover, probably some do not know, but EVERY single condenser microphone capsule (again, true pressure omni is a special case) has a HUGE amount of EQ built into the it, as a function of the resistance controlled system principle of working--something a "native" fig.8 ribbon doesn't have. That's one of the reasons why ribbons take an EQ so well.
But then there are quite a few cardioid (or even multipattern) ribbons, which have excellent and very smooth top frequency response, and for many might be a better choice for the VO application. Usually very expensive, with an exception of vintage Oktava ML19--a wonderful mic, which can be had for some $200-$300 (please keep in mind, most of those will need to be serviced, as they use a foam inside, which deteriorates and completely throughs the things out of wack...)
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best, M _________________ Mark Fouxman
Samar Audio & Microphone Design
www.samaraudiodesign.com
The Art of Ribbon Microphones--design, repairs, re-ribboning, modifications, motor machining and fabrication, transformers, and more... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dayo Cinquecento

Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Posts: 544 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Feb 08, 2012 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the further input Marik.
If all LDC mics are EQ'd in the capsule, does it follow that the tone of any might also be shaped by swapping out components in the mic itself?
As for the Oktava ML19, I'd say that was about the ugliest mic I've seen in a long time! But if it's as smooth as you say, it might well be worth trying. What's the self noise like? _________________ Colin Day - UK Voiceover
www.thurstonday.co.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Marik
Joined: 31 Jan 2012 Posts: 9 Location: SLC
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dayo wrote: | Thanks for the further input Marik.
If all LDC mics are EQ'd in the capsule, does it follow that the tone of any might also be shaped by swapping out components in the mic itself? |
Not only LDC, but also all SD condenser capsules have huge peaks (can be up to 60dB) in the middle of the bandwidth. This is inevitable result of so called "resistance controlled" principle of operation. That is, the resonant tuning frequency is usually between some 900-1300Hz tuning, which after that acoustically (sometimes electronically, like for example in Seinheiser 405, etc.) damped for flat frequency response.
In the end it does not really matter how you change the EQ--acoustically, or electronically. The swapping the components may (or may not) change the tone of the microphone. The most important thing is to know what is your final goal. Sometimes the components change can bring you there, sometimes you need to change the capsule...
Dayo wrote: |
As for the Oktava ML19, I'd say that was about the ugliest mic I've seen in a long time! But if it's as smooth as you say, it might well be worth trying. What's the self noise like? |
The output is quite good, so usually no problem for such close up application as VO. Before you commit to anything I'd suggest to wait a little for some upcoming shootout tests...
Best, M _________________ Mark Fouxman
Samar Audio & Microphone Design
www.samaraudiodesign.com
The Art of Ribbon Microphones--design, repairs, re-ribboning, modifications, motor machining and fabrication, transformers, and more... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|