VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD!
Established November 10, 2004
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Double-mics?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear !
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:00 pm    Post subject: Double-mics? Reply with quote

I noticed in the video that Bruce Miles posted about The Lorax movie that the actors were using a double mic setup. Looks like a U87 in front of another microphone. What does this type of setup achieve?

Watch 1:50 - 1:54.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJAbokTVOC0
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Frank F
Fat, Old, and Sassy


Joined: 10 Nov 2004
Posts: 4421
Location: Park City, Utah

PostPosted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stereo.

It also allows the producer to choose from a mic which can handle higher SPL's better when the VOist gets too loud for the U87.

I usually use two mics when doing "audio drama" one a near-field and the second a pencil mic about five feet away.

Frank F
_________________
Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Yonie
CM


Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 906

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Frank F wrote:
It also allows the producer to choose from a mic which can handle higher SPL's better when the VOist gets too loud for the U87.


Takes away the conscious aspect of playing with the mic. Helps performance, I bet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
georgethetech
The Gates of Troy


Joined: 18 Mar 2007
Posts: 1878
Location: Topanga, CA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are numerous reasons why they would do this.
1- Mics at different distances to match on-camera better. A mic further away makes sense when the actor is further from the "camera". Gives the dialogue mixer more options.
2- If the actor clips one mic, the 2nd mic preamp might be set to a lower gain setting to "CYA". With celebs who have narrow time windows, "let's take that again because it was distorted" may not be acceptable.
3- Simply a backup (but less likely), like the President's dual-SM57 rig.
4- Stereo effects possible in post.
5- Two different mics (as used here) for two different tonal options in post.
_________________
If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
JTVG
Backstage Pass


Joined: 21 Jun 2007
Posts: 433

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Interesting. Thanks guys. I'm always learning something.
_________________
Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Ed Gambill
Cinquecento


Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 561
Location: King, NC 35mi SE of Mayberry

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can't get you tube to run, but sounds like a typical ADR (Additional Dialogue Recording ) set up.

By virtue of the distance from mic 1 closest to talent and mic2 furthest, there will be a gain difference. The reason is (inverse the square of the distance)

When played back these two microphones can be adjusted (provided there is no strong reverb in the room) to obtain a sound that will match the original placement of the microphone on the set.

Now given that this is animation an all audio is recorded in studio the need for two mic may not be that important. Better to have two microphone at the same distance from talent so in case of a problem aka drop out then each microphone would have very similar audio and a direct cut one to the other would not be as noticeable. Cutting front to back will show up for sure.

Then I may be mistaken, can't see the video.
_________________
Esse quam videri "To be rather than to seem"
www.SaVoa.org No. 07000 Member AES
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kgenus
Seriously Devoted


Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 889
Location: Greater NYC Area

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The second mic is there to record the entire session from start to finish, capturing everything, like the real unscripted performances when they're not rolling on the actual takes. It doesn't hinder workflow, as a second producer manages the logging for that recording.

Kevin
_________________
Genus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sounddguy
Contributor IV


Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 100
Location: Atlanta, GA USA

PostPosted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

soundgun wrote:

3- Simply a backup (but less likely), like the President's dual-SM57 rig.

I guess I better pay more attention. Used to be three. They must have had a budget cut.

The usual 3 mic rig was one for house pa, one for the official white house recording and one for the media feed. All three sources were also cross feed to back up each other.

More interesting is the fellow that sprints across the stage to place the presidential seal on the podium after the entrance is announced and then makes the same sprint to remove the seal as the prez is walking off the stage.

I would hate to think what that guys carrier would be like if he miss-placed or lost that seal.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Ed Gambill
Cinquecento


Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 561
Location: King, NC 35mi SE of Mayberry

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

kgenus wrote:
The second mic is there to record the entire session from start to finish, capturing everything, like the real unscripted performances when they're not rolling on the actual takes. Kevin


From the original post it seemed like the placement as describes was an ADR arrangement. In that set-up identical microphones are used and they are the same microphone type used on the set.

Now having seen the video of DeVito in studio I am wondering why two different models were used.

Can the extemporaneous narrative be cut in with out a shift in audio coloration? If using bits of “unscripted performances” are to be used why not split the output of the principal microphone to two different DAW’s or using two identical microphones in a coincident placement. Read more here http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1997_articles/feb97/stereomiking.html

Finally this question was asked “Looks like a U87 in front of another microphone. What does this type of setup achieve?” IMO Not much.
_________________
Esse quam videri "To be rather than to seem"
www.SaVoa.org No. 07000 Member AES
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
kgenus
Seriously Devoted


Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Posts: 889
Location: Greater NYC Area

PostPosted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

"... the order of importance for a VO sound is in this order : 1. VO talent (this is by far the biggest influence); 2. The room; 3. Engineering technique; .... Again, this done with many years experience under our belts." -- Tom Hambleton, CAS

While I can not speak for that particular session (which we should also note was a marketing piece for the film and for all we know could be a marketing piece for a certain studio or microphone manufacture) I am certain given the room and mics present, any engineer worth his/her salt could match those tracks so well the audio differences in the mix would be moot. It happens every day.

I posted Tom's statement from an email because you reminded me these questions are easily answered by the right person. I'm not the right person. I do not believe M&S would be used in a booth, but there's really no reason I can think of why one wouldn't -- in a creative sense. If you want specific details, many of the people and teams working on these sessions participate in the Gearslutz's Post Production forum and are accessible, within reason.
_________________
Genus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    VO-BB - 20 YEARS OLD! Forum Index -> Gear ! All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group