View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JTVG Backstage Pass
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 433
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 10:00 pm Post subject: Double-mics? |
|
|
I noticed in the video that Bruce Miles posted about The Lorax movie that the actors were using a double mic setup. Looks like a U87 in front of another microphone. What does this type of setup achieve?
Watch 1:50 - 1:54.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJAbokTVOC0 _________________ Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Frank F Fat, Old, and Sassy

Joined: 10 Nov 2004 Posts: 4421 Location: Park City, Utah
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2012 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stereo.
It also allows the producer to choose from a mic which can handle higher SPL's better when the VOist gets too loud for the U87.
I usually use two mics when doing "audio drama" one a near-field and the second a pencil mic about five feet away.
Frank F _________________ Be thankful for the bad things in life. They opened your eyes to the good things you weren't paying attention to before. email: thevoice@usa.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Yonie CM

Joined: 31 Aug 2011 Posts: 906
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Frank F wrote: | It also allows the producer to choose from a mic which can handle higher SPL's better when the VOist gets too loud for the U87.
|
Takes away the conscious aspect of playing with the mic. Helps performance, I bet. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
georgethetech The Gates of Troy

Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 1878 Location: Topanga, CA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
There are numerous reasons why they would do this.
1- Mics at different distances to match on-camera better. A mic further away makes sense when the actor is further from the "camera". Gives the dialogue mixer more options.
2- If the actor clips one mic, the 2nd mic preamp might be set to a lower gain setting to "CYA". With celebs who have narrow time windows, "let's take that again because it was distorted" may not be acceptable.
3- Simply a backup (but less likely), like the President's dual-SM57 rig.
4- Stereo effects possible in post.
5- Two different mics (as used here) for two different tonal options in post. _________________ If it sounds good, it is good.
George Whittam
GeorgeThe.Tech
424-226-8528
VOBS.TV Co-host
TheProAudioSuite.com Co-host
TriBooth.com Co-founder |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
JTVG Backstage Pass
Joined: 21 Jun 2007 Posts: 433
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Interesting. Thanks guys. I'm always learning something. _________________ Joe Szymanski
http://www.joethevoiceguy.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Gambill Cinquecento

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Posts: 561 Location: King, NC 35mi SE of Mayberry
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can't get you tube to run, but sounds like a typical ADR (Additional Dialogue Recording ) set up.
By virtue of the distance from mic 1 closest to talent and mic2 furthest, there will be a gain difference. The reason is (inverse the square of the distance)
When played back these two microphones can be adjusted (provided there is no strong reverb in the room) to obtain a sound that will match the original placement of the microphone on the set.
Now given that this is animation an all audio is recorded in studio the need for two mic may not be that important. Better to have two microphone at the same distance from talent so in case of a problem aka drop out then each microphone would have very similar audio and a direct cut one to the other would not be as noticeable. Cutting front to back will show up for sure.
Then I may be mistaken, can't see the video. _________________ Esse quam videri "To be rather than to seem"
www.SaVoa.org No. 07000 Member AES  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kgenus Seriously Devoted

Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 889 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The second mic is there to record the entire session from start to finish, capturing everything, like the real unscripted performances when they're not rolling on the actual takes. It doesn't hinder workflow, as a second producer manages the logging for that recording.
Kevin _________________ Genus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
sounddguy Contributor IV

Joined: 22 Jan 2009 Posts: 100 Location: Atlanta, GA USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
soundgun wrote: |
3- Simply a backup (but less likely), like the President's dual-SM57 rig.
|
I guess I better pay more attention. Used to be three. They must have had a budget cut.
The usual 3 mic rig was one for house pa, one for the official white house recording and one for the media feed. All three sources were also cross feed to back up each other.
More interesting is the fellow that sprints across the stage to place the presidential seal on the podium after the entrance is announced and then makes the same sprint to remove the seal as the prez is walking off the stage.
I would hate to think what that guys carrier would be like if he miss-placed or lost that seal. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Gambill Cinquecento

Joined: 18 Nov 2007 Posts: 561 Location: King, NC 35mi SE of Mayberry
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 7:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
kgenus wrote: | The second mic is there to record the entire session from start to finish, capturing everything, like the real unscripted performances when they're not rolling on the actual takes. Kevin |
From the original post it seemed like the placement as describes was an ADR arrangement. In that set-up identical microphones are used and they are the same microphone type used on the set.
Now having seen the video of DeVito in studio I am wondering why two different models were used.
Can the extemporaneous narrative be cut in with out a shift in audio coloration? If using bits of “unscripted performances” are to be used why not split the output of the principal microphone to two different DAW’s or using two identical microphones in a coincident placement. Read more here http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/1997_articles/feb97/stereomiking.html
Finally this question was asked “Looks like a U87 in front of another microphone. What does this type of setup achieve?” IMO Not much. _________________ Esse quam videri "To be rather than to seem"
www.SaVoa.org No. 07000 Member AES  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kgenus Seriously Devoted

Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 889 Location: Greater NYC Area
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
"... the order of importance for a VO sound is in this order : 1. VO talent (this is by far the biggest influence); 2. The room; 3. Engineering technique; .... Again, this done with many years experience under our belts." -- Tom Hambleton, CAS
While I can not speak for that particular session (which we should also note was a marketing piece for the film and for all we know could be a marketing piece for a certain studio or microphone manufacture) I am certain given the room and mics present, any engineer worth his/her salt could match those tracks so well the audio differences in the mix would be moot. It happens every day.
I posted Tom's statement from an email because you reminded me these questions are easily answered by the right person. I'm not the right person. I do not believe M&S would be used in a booth, but there's really no reason I can think of why one wouldn't -- in a creative sense. If you want specific details, many of the people and teams working on these sessions participate in the Gearslutz's Post Production forum and are accessible, within reason. _________________ Genus |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|